Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karadeniz Technical University, Medical School, Farabi Hospital, 61080 Trabzon, Turkey.
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Feb;32(2):431-4. doi: 10.1007/s00296-010-1677-x. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
The objective of this study was to investigate any relationship between peripheral neuropathy and anti-TNF-α therapy used in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Thirty-nine patients monitored in our clinic with a diagnosis of AS and without neuropathic symptoms were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups. The first consisted of 21 patients using biological agents for more than one year. The control group was made up of 18 patients of similar age and demographic characteristics receiving non-biological therapy. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores were calculated, and sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels measured. Motor and sensory nerve conduction analysis for the median, tibial, and sural nerves was performed. The nerve conduction results of the biological therapy group were then compared with those of the non-biological therapy group. Thirty-nine patients with a mean age of 37.05 ± 8.1 were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups, depending on drugs used. The first group (using anti-TNF-α) consisted of 21 patients with a mean age of 42.2 ± 8.8, and the second (the non-biological group) of 18 patients with a mean age of 35.8 ± 7.5. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, sex, drug use, or duration of disease (p = 0.052, p = 0.55, p = 0.33, and p = 0.72, respectively). Sedimentation rate, CRP, and BASDAI scores were statistically significantly higher in the second group (p = 0.04, p = 0.03, and p = 0.009, respectively). No statistically significant difference was determined in any parameters at nerve conduction analysis between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was a positive correlation between sedimentation rate and median sensory conduction velocity (p = 0.02, r = 0.48) and tibial conduction velocity (p = 0.07, r = 0.43). A negative correlation was determined between duration of disease and median distal motor latency (p = 0.22, r = -0.37) and between length of drug use and median sensory conduction velocity (p = 0.02, r = -0.38). There was no significant correlation between other clinical and demographic data and nerve conduction parameters. No effect on nerve conduction of biological agents in AS patients without neurological symptoms was determined. Clinicians should be alert for signs and symptoms, suggesting neuropathy in patients given anti-TNF-α.
本研究旨在探讨强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者外周神经病变与抗 TNF-α 治疗之间的关系。我们对 39 例在我院接受治疗且无神经症状的 AS 患者进行了监测,将其纳入本研究。将患者分为两组。第一组包括 21 例使用生物制剂治疗超过 1 年的患者。对照组由 18 例年龄和人口统计学特征相似的接受非生物治疗的患者组成。计算 Bath 强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)评分,并测量血沉和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平。对正中神经、胫神经和腓肠神经进行运动和感觉神经传导分析。然后将生物治疗组的神经传导结果与非生物治疗组进行比较。纳入 39 例平均年龄为 37.05±8.1 岁的患者。根据使用的药物将患者分为两组。第一组(使用抗 TNF-α)包括 21 例平均年龄为 42.2±8.8 岁的患者,第二组(非生物组)包括 18 例平均年龄为 35.8±7.5 岁的患者。两组在年龄、性别、药物使用和疾病持续时间方面无统计学差异(p=0.052、p=0.55、p=0.33 和 p=0.72)。第二组的血沉、CRP 和 BASDAI 评分均显著更高(p=0.04、p=0.03 和 p=0.009)。两组间神经传导分析的任何参数均无统计学差异(p>0.05)。血沉与正中感觉神经传导速度呈正相关(p=0.02,r=0.48),与胫神经传导速度呈正相关(p=0.07,r=0.43)。疾病持续时间与正中运动潜伏期呈负相关(p=0.22,r=-0.37),药物使用时间与正中感觉神经传导速度呈负相关(p=0.02,r=-0.38)。其他临床和人口统计学数据与神经传导参数之间无显著相关性。未发现生物制剂对无神经症状的 AS 患者神经传导的影响。临床医生应警惕接受抗 TNF-α 治疗的患者出现神经病变的迹象和症状。