• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Research priorities for administrative challenges of integrated networks of care.整合型医疗照护网络行政挑战的研究重点。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1330-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00934.x.
2
Administrative challenges to regionalization.行政区域化面临的挑战。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1359-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00942.x.
3
Defining and measuring successful emergency care networks: a research agenda.定义和衡量成功的紧急护理网络:研究议程。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1297-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00930.x.
4
5
Regionalized care for time-critical conditions: lessons learned from existing networks.区域性危急病症救治服务:现有网络的经验教训。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1354-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00940.x.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Regionalization and emergency care: the institute of medicine reports and a federal government update.区域化和急救医疗:美国医学研究所报告和联邦政府最新进展。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1351-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00944.x.
8
Patient-centered integrated networks of emergency care: consensus-based recommendations and future research priorities.以患者为中心的急救医疗整合网络:基于共识的推荐意见和未来研究重点。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1322-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00939.x.
9
Summary of NIH Medical-Surgical Emergency Research Roundtable held on April 30 to May 1, 2009.NIH 医疗-外科急诊研究圆桌会议总结,于 2009 年 4 月 30 日至 5 月 1 日举行。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;56(5):522-37. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.03.014.
10
Redesigning health systems for quality: Lessons from emerging practices.为提高质量而重新设计卫生系统:新兴实践的经验教训。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Nov;32(11):599-611. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32078-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulance use and subsequent fragmented hospital readmission among older adults.老年人的救护车使用情况和随后的碎片化医院再入院。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 May;71(5):1416-1428. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18210. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
2
Mixed effect of increasing outflow of medical patients from an emergency department.增加急诊患者流出量的混合效应。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021 Oct 27;10(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13584-021-00491-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in cardiologists' propensity to test and treat: is it associated with regional variation in utilization?心脏病专家进行检测和治疗的倾向差异:这与使用情况的地区差异有关吗?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 May;3(3):253-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.840009. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
2
Follow the money--controlling expenditures by improving care for patients needing costly services.追踪资金流向——通过改善对需要昂贵服务的患者的护理来控制支出。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 15;361(16):1521-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0907185. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
3
Analysis of the literature on emergency department throughput.急诊科吞吐量文献分析。
West J Emerg Med. 2009 May;10(2):104-9.
4
The role of medical liability reform in federal health care reform.医疗责任改革在联邦医疗改革中的作用。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 2;361(1):1-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0903765. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
5
Regionalization of postcardiac arrest care.心脏骤停后护理的区域化
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Jun;15(3):221-7. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e328329c293.
6
Is there empirical evidence for "Defensive Medicine"? A reassessment.“防御性医疗”是否有实证依据?重新评估。
J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):481-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.12.006. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
7
The National Report Card on the State of Emergency Medicine: evaluating the emergency care environment state by state 2009 edition.《急诊医学状况国家报告卡:2009年版逐州评估急诊护理环境状况》
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jan;53(1):4-148. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.10.028.
8
Reconciling access, quality and cost.协调可及性、质量和成本。
J R Soc Promot Health. 2008 Nov;128(6):286-7. doi: 10.1177/1466424008096620.
9
Regionalization in local public health systems: public health preparedness in the Washington metropolitan area.地方公共卫生系统中的区域化:华盛顿都会区的公共卫生应急准备
Public Health Rep. 2008 Jul-Aug;123(4):461-73. doi: 10.1177/003335490812300407.
10
Regionalization in local public health systems: variation in rationale, implementation, and impact on public health preparedness.地方公共卫生系统中的区域化:基本原理、实施情况以及对公共卫生应急准备的影响方面的差异
Public Health Rep. 2008 Jul-Aug;123(4):441-9. doi: 10.1177/003335490812300405.

整合型医疗照护网络行政挑战的研究重点。

Research priorities for administrative challenges of integrated networks of care.

机构信息

Schumacher Group, Lafayette, LA, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1330-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00934.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00934.x
PMID:21122015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3058395/
Abstract

In 2006, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) advanced the concept of "coordinated, regionalized, and accountable emergency care systems" to address significant problems with the delivery of emergency medical care in the United States. Achieving this vision requires the thoughtful implementation of well-aligned, system-level structures and processes that enhance access to emergency care and improve patient outcomes at a sustainable cost. Currently, the delivery of emergency medical care is supported by numerous administrative systems, including economic; reimbursement; legal and regulatory structures; licensure, credentialing, and accreditation processes; medicolegal systems; and quality reporting mechanisms. In addition, many regionalized systems may not optimize patient outcomes because of current administrative barriers that make it difficult for providers to deliver the best care. However, certain administrative barriers may also threaten the sustainability of integration efforts or prevent them altogether. This article identifies significant administrative challenges to integrating networks of emergency care in four specific areas: reimbursement, medical-legal, quality reporting mechanisms, and regulatory aspects. The authors propose a research agenda for indentifying optimal approaches that support consistent access to quality emergency care with improved outcomes for patients, at a sustainable cost. Researching administrative challenges will involve careful examination of the numerous natural experiments in the recent past and will be crucial to understand the impact as we embark on a new era of health reform.

摘要

2006 年,美国医学研究所 (IOM) 提出了“协调、区域化和负责任的紧急护理系统”的概念,以解决美国提供紧急医疗护理方面存在的重大问题。实现这一愿景需要深思熟虑地实施协调一致的系统级结构和流程,以提高获得紧急护理的机会,并以可持续的成本改善患者的治疗效果。目前,紧急医疗护理的提供由众多管理系统支持,包括经济系统、报销系统、法律和监管结构、许可、认证和认可流程、法医学系统和质量报告机制。此外,由于当前的管理障碍使得提供者难以提供最佳护理,许多区域化系统可能无法优化患者的治疗效果。然而,某些管理障碍也可能威胁到整合工作的可持续性,或者完全阻止整合工作的进行。本文确定了在四个具体领域整合紧急护理网络所面临的重大管理挑战:报销、医疗法律、质量报告机制和监管方面。作者提出了一个研究议程,以确定支持患者治疗效果改善和可持续成本下获得一致的高质量紧急护理的最佳方法。研究管理挑战需要仔细研究过去的众多自然实验,并将有助于了解我们在新的卫生改革时代所面临的影响。