• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家急诊医学紧急状态报告卡中的区域化研究结果。

Regionalization findings in the national report card of the state of emergency medicine.

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1349-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00943.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00943.x
PMID:21122018
Abstract

The National Report Card on the State of Emergency Medicine (2009 edition) evaluated the conditions under which emergency care is delivered in each of the 50 states and compared those conditions between the states. The Report Card ranked states in five major categories: access to emergency care, quality and patient safety environment, public health and injury prevention, liability environment, and disaster preparedness. Three of those categories are particularly relevant to regionalization: access to emergency care, quality and patient safety environment, and disaster-preparedness. Within these categories, there was great variability between states in the distribution, planning, infrastructure, and available personnel for emergency care. Effective regionalization may require additional resources or a redistribution of existing resources within and among the states.

摘要

《国家急诊医学状况报告卡(2009 年版)》评估了 50 个州的急诊护理条件,并对各州的条件进行了比较。报告卡将各州分为五个主要类别:急诊护理的可及性、质量和患者安全环境、公共卫生和伤害预防、责任环境以及备灾能力。其中三个类别与区域化特别相关:急诊护理的可及性、质量和患者安全环境以及备灾能力。在这些类别中,各州在急诊护理的分布、规划、基础设施和可用人员方面存在很大差异。有效的区域化可能需要在州内和州际之间增加资源或重新分配现有资源。

相似文献

1
Regionalization findings in the national report card of the state of emergency medicine.国家急诊医学紧急状态报告卡中的区域化研究结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1349-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00943.x.
2
America's emergency care environment, a state-by-state Report Card: 2014 edition.美国急诊护理环境,逐州成绩单:2014年版
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;63(2):97-242. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.11.024.
3
The North Carolina EMS Data System: a comprehensive integrated emergency medical services quality improvement program.北卡罗来纳州 EMS 数据系统:一个综合性的集成式紧急医疗服务质量改进计划。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):85-94. doi: 10.3109/10903120903349846.
4
The preparedness of schools to respond to emergencies in children: a national survey of school nurses.学校应对儿童紧急情况的准备情况:一项针对学校护士的全国性调查。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e738-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1474.
5
The shame of emergency care for kids.儿童急诊护理之耻。
US News World Rep. 1992 Jan 27;112(3):34-8, 40, 42-3.
6
Latest ACEP national, state-level report cards cite ample room for improvement.美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)最新的全国及州级报告卡显示仍有很大的改进空间。
ED Manag. 2014 Mar;26(3):25-7.
7
The national report card on the state of emergency medicine.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 May;106(5):254-5.
8
Healthcare provider complaints to the emergency department: a preliminary report on a new quality improvement instrument.医疗服务提供者对急诊科的投诉:一种新的质量改进工具的初步报告。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Oct;15(5):344-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015776.
9
Health and medical preparedness and response to the 2008 Republican National Convention.2008 年共和党全国代表大会期间的卫生和医疗准备及应对工作。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3(4):224-32. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181c5b4a8.
10
Emergency medicine in the Bahamas.巴哈马群岛的急诊医学。
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):684-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118865.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement and education: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.参与和教育:大流行和灾难期间危重症及受伤患者的护理:CHEST共识声明
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e118S-33S. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0740.