Suppr超能文献

一种非处方糖化血红蛋白(A1C)检测试剂盒的评估。

Evaluation of an over-the-counter glycated hemoglobin (A1C) test kit.

作者信息

Chang Anna, Frank Joy, Knaebel Jennifer, Fullam Jeanellen, Pardo Scott, Simmons David A

机构信息

John Muir Physician Network Clinical Research Center, Concord, California, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 1;4(6):1495-503. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400625.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glycated hemoglobin (A1C) monitoring is an integral component of diabetes management. This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the A1CNow® SELFCHECK device when used by lay users and health care professionals (HCPs) to measure A1C.

METHODS

Subjects performed two A1CNow SELFCHECK finger-stick self-tests followed by a finger-stick test of the subject's blood by a HCP. The primary endpoint assessed accuracy of the subject and HCP A1CNow SELFCHECK readings. Secondary endpoints included precision, comprehension of instructional material (written material±DVD), and product satisfaction. For accuracy comparison, a venous blood sample was drawn from each subject and tested by laboratory (TOSOH) analysis. Subject comprehension of product instructional material was evaluated via first-time failure (FTF) rate as recorded by the HCP, and subject satisfaction was assessed through written survey.

RESULTS

A total of 110 subjects with (n=93) and without (n=17) diabetes participated. Of 177 subject A1C values, 165 (93.2%) were within the acceptable range of ±13.5% of the laboratory reference value and considered accurate. Regression analysis showed good correlation of subject values to laboratory and HCP results (R2=0.93 for both). The average within-subject coefficient of variation was 4.57% (n=74). The FTF rates with and without instructional DVD were 11.3% (n=56) and 39.6% (n=54), respectively. Subjects with diabetes/prediabetes overwhelmingly indicated that they were "very" to "extremely" likely (93.5%) to discuss their home A1C results with their HCP.

CONCLUSIONS

Lay users found the A1CNow SELFCHECK easy to use, and both lay users and HCPs were able to measure A1C accurately.

摘要

背景

糖化血红蛋白(A1C)监测是糖尿病管理的一个重要组成部分。本研究旨在评估非专业用户和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)使用A1CNow® SELFCHECK设备测量A1C的性能。

方法

受试者进行两次A1CNow SELFCHECK手指采血自检,然后由HCP对受试者的血液进行手指采血检测。主要终点评估受试者和HCP的A1CNow SELFCHECK读数的准确性。次要终点包括精密度、对指导材料(书面材料±DVD)的理解以及产品满意度。为了进行准确性比较,从每个受试者采集静脉血样本并通过实验室(TOSOH)分析进行检测。通过HCP记录的首次失败(FTF)率评估受试者对产品指导材料的理解,并通过书面调查评估受试者满意度。

结果

共有110名有(n = 93)和无(n = 17)糖尿病的受试者参与。在177个受试者的A1C值中,165个(93.2%)在实验室参考值±13.5%的可接受范围内,被认为是准确的。回归分析显示受试者的值与实验室和HCP的结果具有良好的相关性(两者的R2 = 0.93)。受试者内平均变异系数为4.57%(n = 74)。有和没有指导DVD时的FTF率分别为11.3%(n = 56)和39.6%(n = 54)。患有糖尿病/糖尿病前期的受试者绝大多数表示他们“非常”到“极其”有可能(93.5%)与他们的HCP讨论他们在家中的A1C结果。

结论

非专业用户发现A1CNow SELFCHECK易于使用,非专业用户和HCP都能够准确测量A1C。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical use of hemoglobin A1c.糖化血红蛋白A1c的临床应用。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Jul 1;3(4):629-34. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300402.
2
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2010》
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.
4
Advances in hemoglobin A1c point of care technology.糖化血红蛋白即时检测技术的进展。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007 May;1(3):405-11. doi: 10.1177/193229680700100314.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验