Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
J Neuroophthalmol. 2011 Jun;31(2):110-6. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181facbbd.
To compare the mean central macular thickness (CMT) and the mean average optic nerve retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in the eyes of patients with a history of optic neuritis and/or multiple sclerosis (MS) using 5 commercially available optical coherence tomography (OCT) instruments.
Cross-sectional study including 46 patients (92 eyes) with a history of optic neuritis and/or MS. Both eyes were imaged on the same day with 5 OCT instruments: 1 time-domain OCT (Stratus) and 4 different Fourier-domain (spectral-domain) OCT (3D OCT-1000, Cirrus, RTVue-100, and Spectralis).
Twenty-five patients (50 eyes) were included in the final analysis after excluding patients with diabetes, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, or retinal pathology and inadequate scan quality. Randomized block analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences across instruments (P < 0.001) for both eyes for mean CMT and mean average optic nerve RNFL. When testing for significant differences in measurements from instrument to instrument, some difference was noted between the right and left eyes.
Statistically significant differences exist among commercially available OCT instruments in measuring mean CMT and mean average RNFL thickness in patients with optic neuritis and/or MS. These findings likely result from the differences in data acquisition and segmentation algorithm software among OCT instruments. Awareness of these variations among OCT instruments will be important in using these instruments for clinical trials and management of patients with optic neuritis and/or MS.
比较视神经炎和/或多发性硬化症(MS)病史患者的平均中央黄斑厚度(CMT)和平均平均视神经视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度,使用 5 种市售的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)仪器。
包括 46 例(92 只眼)视神经炎和/或 MS 病史的患者的横断面研究。在同一天使用 5 种 OCT 仪器对双眼进行成像:1 种时域 OCT(Stratus)和 4 种不同的傅里叶域(光谱域)OCT(3D OCT-1000、Cirrus、RTVue-100 和 Spectralis)。
在排除糖尿病、青光眼、高眼压或视网膜病变和扫描质量不佳的患者后,25 例(50 只眼)患者被纳入最终分析。对于双眼的平均 CMT 和平均平均视神经 RNFL,随机块方差分析显示仪器之间存在统计学显著差异(P <0.001)。在测试仪器之间测量值的显着差异时,注意到右眼和左眼之间存在一些差异。
在测量视神经炎和/或 MS 患者的平均 CMT 和平均平均 RNFL 厚度方面,市售的 OCT 仪器之间存在统计学显着差异。这些发现可能是由于 OCT 仪器之间的数据采集和分割算法软件的差异所致。了解这些 OCT 仪器之间的差异对于使用这些仪器进行临床试验和管理视神经炎和/或 MS 患者非常重要。