Kochak Hamid Emadi, SeyedAlinaghi SeyedAhmad, Zarghom Omid, Hekmat Shadi, Jam Sara, Sabzvari Duman, Abdi Zahra
Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Acta Med Iran. 2010 Jan-Feb;48(1):21-6.
Identification of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in sputum or tissue samples is among definite diagnostic methods of tuberculosis. However, this method of diagnosis is restricted by certain limitations. Serologic diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) has been used for a long time. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and, specificity of Antigen 60 (A60) IgG, IgA, IgM test results in TB diagnosis. Mycobacterial A60-based ELISA was used to measure specific IgA, IgM and IgG antibodies in the sera of 127 adult TB patients (consisted of 74 pulmonary and 53 extra-pulmonary cases), and 95 controls (46 healthy volunteers and 49 patients with various acute or chronic diseases other than tuberculosis). Data from A60 IgG-based ELISA, chest radiography, AFB culture and pathologic evaluation for AFB were obtained .The cutoff value of A60 IgG, IgA and IgM were chosen according to a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratio were determined. The mean levels of IgG, IgA and IgM were significantly higher in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis when compared with control groups. Sensitivity of IgG test was 54.3 %, while the specificity was 84.2%. The IgA test showed a sensitivity of 70.1% with a specificity of 80 %. Combination of the IgG and IgA tests showed a total sensitivity of 45.7 % and a specificity of 94.7% and the positive likelihood ratio of 8.62. Chosen cutoff values of IgG, IgA, and IgM sets were 285,265 and 0.9 ELISA units respectively. Our study results showed a good specificity (94.7%) and a reasonable positive likelihood ratio (8.62) of the test when combined IgA and IgG with new cutoff points were considered on diagnosis of tuberculosis in adult patients. Combined use of both IgG and IgA tests results allows an increased accuracy in diagnostic of tuberculosis.
在痰液或组织样本中鉴定抗酸杆菌(AFB)是结核病明确诊断方法之一。然而,这种诊断方法受到一定限制。结核病的血清学诊断已使用很长时间。本研究的目的是确定抗原60(A60)IgG、IgA、IgM检测结果在结核病诊断中的敏感性和特异性。基于分枝杆菌A60的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)用于检测127例成年结核病患者(包括74例肺结核和53例肺外结核病例)以及95例对照者(46名健康志愿者和49例患有除结核病以外各种急慢性疾病的患者)血清中的特异性IgA、IgM和IgG抗体。获取基于A60 IgG的ELISA数据、胸部X线摄影、AFB培养以及AFB的病理评估结果。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)分析选择A60 IgG、IgA和IgM的临界值。确定敏感性、特异性和阳性似然比。与对照组相比,肺结核患者的IgG、IgA和IgM平均水平显著更高。IgG检测的敏感性为54.3%,而特异性为84.2%。IgA检测的敏感性为70.1%,特异性为80%。IgG和IgA检测联合显示总敏感性为45.7%,特异性为94.7%,阳性似然比为8.62。选择的IgG、IgA和IgM临界值分别为285、265和0.9 ELISA单位。我们的研究结果表明,当考虑联合IgA和IgG并采用新的临界值用于成年患者结核病诊断时,该检测具有良好的特异性(94.7%)和合理的阳性似然比(8.62)。IgG和IgA检测结果联合使用可提高结核病诊断的准确性。