Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIchigan 48109-5338, USA.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jan;14(1):99-105. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE1085. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
surgical correction of symptomatic cervical or cervicothoracic kyphosis involves the potential for significant neurological complications. Intraoperative monitoring has been shown to reduce the risk of neurological injury in scoliosis surgery, but it has not been well evaluated during surgery for cervical or cervicothoracic kyphosis. In this article, the authors review a cohort of patients who underwent kyphosis correction with multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM).
twenty-nine patients were included in the study. Preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were measured to determine the extent of correction. Multimodal intraoperative monitoring consisted of somatosensory evoked potentials, transcranial motor evoked potentials (tMEPs), and electromyography activity. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were assessed for each monitoring modality.
the mean patient age was 58.0 years, and 20 patients were female. The mean pre- and postoperative sagittal Cobb angles were 41.3° and 7.3°, respectively. A total of 8 intraoperative monitoring alerts were observed. Transcranial MEPs yielded a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 84%, PPV of 43%, and NPV of 95%. Somatosensory evoked potentials had a sensitivity of 25%, specificity of 96%, PPV of 50%, and NPV of 88%. Electromyography resulted in a sensitivity of 0%, specificity of 93%, PPV of 0%, and NPV of 96%. Changes in tMEPs led to successful intervention in 2 cases. There was 1 case in which a C-8 palsy occurred without any changes in MIOM.
in contrast to sensitivity and PPV, specificity and NPV were generally high in all 3 monitoring modalities. Both false-positive and false-negative results occurred. Transcranial MEP monitoring was the most useful modality and appeared to allow successful intervention in certain cases. Larger, prospective comparative studies are necessary to determine whether MIOM truly decreases the rate of neurological complications and is therefore worth the added economic cost and intraoperative time.
有症状的颈椎或颈胸段后凸畸形的手术矫正涉及到发生严重神经并发症的潜在风险。术中监测已被证明可降低脊柱侧凸手术中神经损伤的风险,但在颈椎或颈胸段后凸畸形手术中尚未得到很好的评估。在本文中,作者回顾了一组接受多模态术中监测(MIOM)的后凸矫正患者。
本研究纳入 29 例患者。测量术前和术后 Cobb 角以确定矫正程度。多模态术中监测包括体感诱发电位、经颅运动诱发电位(tMEPs)和肌电图活动。评估每种监测方式的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。
患者平均年龄为 58.0 岁,20 例为女性。术前和术后矢状面 Cobb 角分别为 41.3°和 7.3°。共观察到 8 次术中监测警报。经颅 MEPs 的敏感性为 75%,特异性为 84%,PPV 为 43%,NPV 为 95%。体感诱发电位的敏感性为 25%,特异性为 96%,PPV 为 50%,NPV 为 88%。肌电图的敏感性为 0%,特异性为 93%,PPV 为 0%,NPV 为 96%。tMEPs 的变化导致 2 例成功干预。有 1 例 C8 麻痹发生,但 MIOM 无变化。
与敏感性和 PPV 相比,所有 3 种监测方式的特异性和 NPV 通常都较高。均出现假阳性和假阴性结果。经颅 MEP 监测是最有用的监测方式,似乎可以在某些情况下进行成功的干预。需要更大的、前瞻性的对照研究来确定 MIOM 是否确实降低了神经并发症的发生率,因此是否值得增加额外的经济成本和术中时间。