• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机化临床决策支持可改善腹腔内外科脓毒症患者的死亡率。

Computerized clinical decision support improves mortality in intra abdominal surgical sepsis.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medical College, Surgical Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2010 Dec;200(6):839-43; discussion 843-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.036.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.036
PMID:21146030
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of surgical sepsis is challenging because of the complexity of interventions. The authors therefore created a computerized clinical decision support program to facilitate this process, with the goal of improving abdominal sepsis mortality.

METHODS

The authors evaluated a prospective database for all patients requiring surgery for abdominal sepsis. Patient demographics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, sepsis source, and hospital mortality data were obtained. Observed mortality was compared with predicted mortality using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 59 ± 17.0 years, and 39% were men. The most common source of infection was the colon (45%). The average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 27.6 ± 9.72. The overall actual mortality rate for the cohort was 24% compared with a predicted Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II mortality of 62.5% (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The use of computerized clinical decision support results in significantly improved survival in patients with intra-abdominal surgical sepsis.

摘要

背景

由于干预措施的复杂性,外科脓毒症的治疗具有挑战性。因此,作者创建了一个计算机化的临床决策支持程序来促进这一过程,目标是降低腹腔脓毒症的死亡率。

方法

作者评估了所有需要手术治疗腹腔脓毒症的患者的前瞻性数据库。获得了患者人口统计学、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分、脓毒症来源和医院死亡率数据。使用 Fisher 精确检验比较观察死亡率与预测死亡率。

结果

87 名患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄为 59 ± 17.0 岁,39%为男性。最常见的感染源是结肠(45%)。平均急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分为 27.6 ± 9.72。该队列的总体实际死亡率为 24%,而预测的急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 死亡率为 62.5%(P <.0001)。

结论

使用计算机化临床决策支持可显著提高腹腔内外科脓毒症患者的生存率。

相似文献

1
Computerized clinical decision support improves mortality in intra abdominal surgical sepsis.计算机化临床决策支持可改善腹腔内外科脓毒症患者的死亡率。
Am J Surg. 2010 Dec;200(6):839-43; discussion 843-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.036.
2
Open abdomen management of intra-abdominal sepsis.腹腔内感染的开放性腹腔管理
Am Surg. 2004 Feb;70(2):137-40; discussion 140.
3
Re-operation for complicated secondary peritonitis - how to identify patients at risk for persistent sepsis.复杂性继发性腹膜炎的再次手术——如何识别有持续性脓毒症风险的患者。
Eur J Med Res. 2003 Mar 27;8(3):125-34.
4
[Intra-abdominal sepsis: surgical management].
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1995 Jan-Apr;15(1):62-73.
5
[Abdominal sepsis: the integral assessment of the severity of patient condition and of multiple organ dysfunction].
Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2000 May-Jun(3):29-33.
6
[Study of cytokines kinetics in severe sepsis and its relationship with mortality and score of organic dysfunction].[严重脓毒症细胞因子动力学研究及其与死亡率和器官功能障碍评分的关系]
Rev Med Chil. 2001 Apr;129(4):347-58.
7
[Management of the abdominal wall in sepsis. Comparison of two techniques].
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2004 Apr-Jun;69(2):88-93.
8
Practice and perception--a nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis.实践与认知——一项关于脓毒症治疗习惯的全国性调查
Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2719-25. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b6f3.
9
Defining sepsis.定义脓毒症。
Clin Chest Med. 2008 Dec;29(4):585-90, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.06.001.
10
[Surgical sepsis. II. Effectiveness of immune therapy with recombinant interleukin-2].
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 2002;161(4):79-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Management Protocols for Sepsis and Septic Shock after Craniotomy: Clinical Outcomes and Survival Analysis.开颅术后脓毒症和脓毒性休克的管理方案:临床结果与生存分析
Asian J Neurosurg. 2025 May 1;20(3):564-571. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809051. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
One-Hour Bundle Protocols for Surgical Sepsis and Septic Shock in Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Clinical Outcome Aspects in the Thai Context.外科重症监护病房中手术性脓毒症和脓毒性休克的一小时捆绑式治疗方案:泰国背景下的临床结果分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 12;16(6):e62215. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62215. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
The effect of time until surgical intervention on survival in dogs with secondary septic peritonitis.
手术干预时间对继发性化脓性腹膜炎犬类存活率的影响。
Can Vet J. 2016 Dec;57(12):1267-1273.
4
HMGB1 as a therapeutic target for sepsis: it's all in the timing!高迁移率族蛋白 B1 作为脓毒症治疗靶点:关键在于时机!
Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2014 Mar;18(3):243-5. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2014.883380. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Clinical decision support for colon and rectal surgery: an overview.结肠和直肠手术的临床决策支持:综述
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Mar;26(1):23-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333644.
6
Acute kidney injury is surprisingly common and a powerful predictor of mortality in surgical sepsis.急性肾损伤在外科脓毒症中非常常见,也是死亡率的有力预测指标。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Sep;75(3):432-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829de6cd.
7
Surgical sepsis and organ crosstalk: the role of the kidney.外科脓毒症与器官串扰:肾脏的作用。
J Surg Res. 2011 May 15;167(2):306-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.923. Epub 2010 Dec 30.