Suppr超能文献

促进早餐摄入的基于理论的简短干预措施的随机对照试验。

Randomised controlled trial of a brief theory-based intervention promoting breakfast consumption.

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Appetite. 2011 Feb;56(1):148-55. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

Abstract

The present study sought to test the efficacy of a brief theory-based intervention to promote regular consumption of breakfast, and to expand previous results suggesting that the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) can be meaningfully applied to breakfast consumption. A four-armed randomised controlled trial was conducted. Participants (n=349) were allocated to receive either a (1) positively framed attitude intervention, (2) negatively framed attitude intervention, (3) Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC) intervention, or (4) control task. Attitude, subjective norm, PBC and behaviour were measured at baseline and 4-week follow-up. All three interventions employed persuasive communication and an implementation intention task. The intervention did not result in expected increases in breakfast consumption, or in changes in attitude, subjective norm or PBC. However, baseline attitude, subjective norm and PBC predicted 39.3% of baseline intention. Baseline intention in turn predicted 33% of breakfast consumption at 4 weeks. Change in breakfast consumption was predicted by change in attitude, subjective norm, and PBC between baseline and follow-up. Despite a lack of intervention effects, the TPB provided a good model of breakfast consumption over the four-week follow-up period. By expanding on previous work investigating breakfast consumption using the TPB, this study provides further support for the argument that that theory based interventions could result in meaningful increases in breakfast consumption.

摘要

本研究旨在测试一项基于理论的简短干预措施对促进规律食用早餐的效果,并扩展先前表明计划行为理论(TPB)可被用于早餐消费的研究结果。研究采用了四项随机对照试验。参与者(n=349)被分配接受以下干预措施之一:(1)积极框架态度干预,(2)消极框架态度干预,(3)感知行为控制(PBC)干预,或(4)控制任务。在基线和 4 周随访时测量了态度、主观规范、PBC 和行为。所有三种干预措施都采用了有说服力的沟通和实施意图任务。干预并未导致预期的早餐消费增加,也未导致态度、主观规范或 PBC 的变化。然而,基线态度、主观规范和 PBC 预测了基线意图的 39.3%。基线意图反过来又预测了 4 周时早餐消费的 33%。早餐消费的变化受基线和随访期间态度、主观规范和 PBC 的变化所预测。尽管干预措施没有效果,但 TPB 在四周的随访期间提供了早餐消费的良好模型。通过扩展使用 TPB 研究早餐消费的先前工作,本研究进一步支持了基于理论的干预措施可能会导致早餐消费的有意义增加的观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验