Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy.
Am J Surg. 2011 Jan;201(1):e5-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.05.015.
since 2005, we refined the technique of perihepatic packing including complete mobilization of the right lobe and packing around the posterior paracaval surface, lateral right side, and anterior and posteroinferior surfaces.
two groups of patients with grade IV/V liver trauma underwent perihepatic packing before and after 2005. The study group included 12 patients treated with the new technique. The control group included 23 patients treated with the old technique.
all 13 patients except one who died within 24 hours were treated with the old technique. The overall survival rate was 75% in the patients treated with the new technique (vs 30.4%, P < .02); the liver-related mortality was 8.3% versus 34.8% (P = not significant). The mean survival time in the intensive care unit was longer in the latest group (39.4 vs 22.3 days, P = not significant). The incidence of rebleeding requiring repacking was 16.7% in the patients who underwent new packing versus 45.5% in the patient who were treated with the old technique (P = not significant). The overall (81.8% vs 100%, P = not significant) and liver-related morbidity rate (18.2% vs 41.7%, P = not significant) and the incidence of abdominal sepsis (9.1% vs 41.7%, P = not significant) decreased.
our refined technique of perihepatic packing seems to be safe and effective.
自 2005 年以来,我们改进了肝周填塞技术,包括完全游离右叶并填塞肝后腔旁、右侧旁、前下和后下表面。
两组 IV/V 级肝外伤患者分别在 2005 年前后行肝周填塞术,研究组 12 例采用新技术治疗,对照组 23 例采用旧技术治疗。
除 1 例在 24 小时内死亡的患者外,其余 13 例均采用旧技术治疗,采用新技术治疗的患者总体存活率为 75%(vs 30.4%,P<.02);肝相关死亡率为 8.3%(vs 34.8%,P=无显著差异)。在最新组中,在重症监护病房的平均存活时间较长(39.4 比 22.3 天,P=无显著差异)。行新填塞术的患者中再出血需重新填塞的发生率为 16.7%,而采用旧技术治疗的患者为 45.5%(P=无显著差异)。总的(81.8%比 100%,P=无显著差异)和肝相关发病率(18.2%比 41.7%,P=无显著差异)以及腹部脓毒症的发生率(9.1%比 41.7%,P=无显著差异)均降低。
我们改进的肝周填塞技术似乎是安全有效的。