Military Mental Health Research Center, and University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 May;120(2):299-307. doi: 10.1037/a0021806.
Psychological trauma and prolonged stress may cause mental disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Pretrauma personality is an important determinant of posttraumatic adjustment. Specifically, trait neuroticism has been identified as a risk factor for PTSD. Additionally, the combination of high negative affectivity or neuroticism with marked social inhibition or introversion, also called Type D personality (Denollet, 2000), may compose a risk factor for PTSD. There is no research available that examined pretrauma Type D personality in relation to PTSD. The present study examined the predictive validity of the Type D personality construct in a sample of Dutch soldiers. Data were collected prior to and 6 months after military deployment to Afghanistan. Separate multiple regression analyses were performed to examine the predictive validity of Type D personality. First, Type D personality was defined as the interaction between negative affect and social inhibition (Na × Si). In a second analysis, Type D was defined following cutoff criteria recommended by Denollet (2000). Results showed that negative affectivity was a significant predictor of PTSD symptoms. Social inhibition and the interaction Na × Si did not add to the amount of explained variance in postdeployment PTSD scores over the effects of childhood abuse, negative affectivity, and prior psychological symptoms. A second analysis showed that Type D personality (dichotomous) did not add to the amount of explained variance in postdeployment PTSD scores over the effects of childhood abuse, and prior psychological symptoms. Therefore, Type D personality appears to be of limited value to explain development of combat-related PTSD symptoms.
心理创伤和长期压力可能导致精神障碍,如创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。创伤前人格是创伤后适应的一个重要决定因素。具体来说,特质神经质已被确定为 PTSD 的一个风险因素。此外,高负性情绪或神经质与明显的社交抑制或内向相结合,也称为 D 型人格(Denollet,2000 年),也可能构成 PTSD 的一个风险因素。目前还没有研究探讨创伤前 D 型人格与 PTSD 的关系。本研究在荷兰士兵样本中检验了 D 型人格结构的预测效度。数据是在军事部署到阿富汗之前和之后 6 个月收集的。分别进行了多重回归分析,以检验 D 型人格的预测效度。首先,D 型人格被定义为负性情绪和社交抑制之间的相互作用(Na × Si)。在第二次分析中,D 型人格是根据 Denollet(2000 年)推荐的临界标准定义的。结果表明,负性情绪是 PTSD 症状的一个显著预测因子。社交抑制和 Na × Si 的相互作用并没有增加儿童虐待、负性情绪和先前心理症状对部署后 PTSD 评分的方差解释量。第二次分析表明,D 型人格(二分法)对儿童虐待和先前心理症状对部署后 PTSD 评分的方差解释量没有增加。因此,D 型人格对解释与战斗相关的 PTSD 症状的发展似乎价值有限。