• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威的儿童保育可用性和生育率。

Child-care availability and fertility in Norway.

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and East-West Center, Honolulu.

出版信息

Popul Dev Rev. 2010;36(4):725-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00355.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00355.x
PMID:21174867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3099220/
Abstract

The child-care and fertility hypothesis has been in the literature for a long time and is straightforward: As child care becomes more available, affordable, and acceptable, the antinatalist effects of increased female educational attainment and work opportunities decrease. As an increasing number of countries express concern about low fertility, the child-care and fertility hypothesis takes on increased importance. Yet data and statistical limitations have heretofore limited empirical tests of the hypothesis. Using rich longitudinal data and appropriate statistical methodology, We show that increased availability of child care increases completed fertility. Moreover, this positive effect of child-care availability is found at every parity transition. We discuss the generalizability of these results to other settings and their broader importance for understanding variation and trends in low fertility.

摘要

儿童保育和生育假说在文献中已经存在很长时间了,其内容很直接:随着儿童保育变得更加易得、负担得起和被接受,女性受教育程度提高和工作机会增加所产生的反生育效果会减弱。随着越来越多的国家对低生育率表示担忧,儿童保育和生育假说变得更加重要。然而,数据和统计限制此前一直限制了对该假说的实证检验。我们使用丰富的纵向数据和适当的统计方法,表明儿童保育可用性的增加会提高生育完成率。此外,在每个生育阶段都可以发现儿童保育可用性的这种积极影响。我们讨论了这些结果在其他环境中的普遍性及其对理解低生育率变化和趋势的更广泛重要性。

相似文献

1
Child-care availability and fertility in Norway.挪威的儿童保育可用性和生育率。
Popul Dev Rev. 2010;36(4):725-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00355.x.
2
Home and politics: women and conservative activism in early twentieth-century Britain.家庭与政治:20世纪初英国的女性与保守主义激进主义
J Br Stud. 2010;49(4):826-48. doi: 10.1086/654913.
3
The maternalist moment in British colonial policy: the controversy over "child slavery" in Hong Kong 1917-1941.英国殖民政策中的母性主义时刻:1917年至1941年香港关于“儿童奴隶制”的争议
Past Present. 2001(171):161-202. doi: 10.1093/past/171.1.161.
4
Eleanor Rathbone on the Remuneration of Women's Services.埃莉诺·拉思伯恩论妇女服务的报酬
Popul Dev Rev. 1999;25(1):145-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00145.x.
5
[Housewife and wage earner, 1940-60].[家庭主妇与挣钱养家者,1940 - 1960年]
Arbeiderhistorie. 2001:27-41.
6
The employment of women and children in agriculture: a reassessment of agricultural gangs in nineteenth-century Norfolk.19世纪诺福克郡农业中妇女和儿童的雇佣情况:对农业帮工的重新评估
Agric Hist Rev. 2001;49(1):41-55.
7
[Visions of a new society: women and family in early Soviet law].[新社会的愿景:苏联早期法律中的女性与家庭]
Nordisk Ost Forum. 2002;16(1):65-78.
8
Amazing Grace: twentieth-century guardian of the Seagrave Missionary legacy.《奇异恩典》:20世纪西格里夫传教遗产的守护者。
Am Baptist Q. 1999;18(4):383-8.
9
Engendering a people: Soviet women and socialist rebirth in Russia.孕育一个民族:苏联女性与俄罗斯的社会主义重生
Can Slavon Pap. 1999;41(3-4):431-55. doi: 10.1080/00085006.1999.11092228.
10
Dorothy Kinney Chambers: a most valiant woman.多萝西·金尼·钱伯斯:一位极其勇敢的女性。
Am Baptist Q. 1999;18(4):389-95.

引用本文的文献

1
Iranian single-child couples' perceptions and experiences regarding childbearing incentives.伊朗独生子夫妇对生育激励措施的看法和经验。
Reprod Health. 2024 Oct 17;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01885-z.
2
Understanding parental preference for childcare: a cross-sectional study in Chongqing, China.了解父母对儿童保育的偏好:中国重庆的一项横断面研究。
Front Sociol. 2024 Sep 16;9:1380334. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1380334. eCollection 2024.
3
What is driving the global decline of human fertility? Need for a multidisciplinary approach to the underlying mechanisms.

本文引用的文献

1
UNIVERSAL VERSUS ECONOMICALLY POLARIZED CHANGE IN AGE AT FIRST BIRTH: A FRENCH-BRITISH COMPARISON.头胎生育年龄的普遍变化与经济两极分化变化:法国与英国的比较
Popul Dev Rev. 2009 Mar;35(1):89-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00262.x.
2
Female working roles and fertility.女性工作角色与生育。
Demography. 1967 Mar;4(1):210-7. doi: 10.2307/2060362.
3
Gender inequality in the welfare state: sex segregation in housework, 1965-2003.福利国家中的性别不平等:1965-2003 年家务劳动中的性别隔离。
是什么导致了全球人类生育率的下降?需要采用多学科方法研究其潜在机制。
Front Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 25;6:1364352. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1364352. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of planned number of children, the well-being of the couple and associated factors in a prospective cohort in Yokohama (HAMA study): study protocol.横滨前瞻性队列研究(HAMA 研究)中计划生育子女数量、夫妻幸福感及其相关因素评估:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 26;14(2):e076557. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076557.
5
Longitudinal Examination of Which Married Young Women Use Contraception to Delay a First Pregnancy in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India.印度比哈尔邦和北方邦已婚年轻女性为推迟首次怀孕而使用避孕措施的纵向研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 2;20(15):6504. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156504.
6
Sustained and Universal Fertility Recuperation in Kazakhstan.哈萨克斯坦生育率的持续全面恢复
Eur J Popul. 2023 Jul 13;39(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s10680-023-09671-6.
7
Universal Transfers, Tax Breaks and Fertility: Evidence from a Regional Reform in Norway.普遍转移支付、税收减免与生育率:来自挪威一项地区改革的证据
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023;42(3):49. doi: 10.1007/s11113-023-09793-z. Epub 2023 May 23.
8
Social Investment Policies and Childbearing Across 20 Countries: Longitudinal and Micro-Level Analyses.20个国家的社会投资政策与生育情况:纵向和微观层面分析
Eur J Popul. 2022 Jun 30;38(5):951-974. doi: 10.1007/s10680-022-09626-3. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Educational Differences in Cohort Fertility Across Sub-national Regions in Europe.欧洲次国家区域间队列生育率的教育差异。
Eur J Popul. 2020 Aug 10;37(1):263-295. doi: 10.1007/s10680-020-09562-0. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Hired helpers at the nest: The association between life-cycle servants and net fertility in North Orkney, 1851-1911.巢内雇工:1851-1911 年,北奥克尼生命周期佣人与净生育率的关系。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020 Jul;172(3):412-422. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24040. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
AJS. 2010 Mar;115(5):1480-523. doi: 10.1086/651384.
4
Low Fertility at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century.二十一世纪之交的低生育率。
Annu Rev Sociol. 2006 Aug 1;32:375-399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122220.
5
Gender and the making of welfare states: Norway and Sweden.性别与福利国家的形成:挪威和瑞典
Soc Polit. 2001;8(1):113-43. doi: 10.1093/sp/8.1.113.
6
Will the stork return to Europe and Japan? Understanding fertility within developed nations.鹳会重返欧洲和日本吗?解读发达国家的生育率情况。
J Econ Perspect. 2008 Summer;22(3):3-22. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.3.3.
7
Child care availability and first-birth timing in Norway.挪威的儿童保育可及性与首次生育时间
Demography. 2007 May;44(2):345-72. doi: 10.1353/dem.2007.0017.
8
Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis?低生育率是21世纪的人口危机吗?
Demography. 2003 Nov;40(4):589-603. doi: 10.1353/dem.2003.0037.
9
Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: a search for commonalities.现代社会生育危机的解释:探寻共性。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2003 Nov;57(3):241-63. doi: 10.1080/0032472032000137790.
10
Maternal employment in Scandinavia: a comparison of the after-birth employment activity of Norwegian and Swedish women.斯堪的纳维亚地区的母亲就业情况:挪威和瑞典女性产后就业活动的比较。
J Popul Econ. 1996;9(3):267-85. doi: 10.1007/BF00176688.