Pais Raluca, Lupşor Monica, Poantă Laura, Silaghi Alina, Rusu M L, Badea R, Dumitraşcu D L
2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Rom J Intern Med. 2009;47(4):331-40.
The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing in general population so it is impossible to perform liver biopsy in such a large number of patients to identify those with advanced fibrosis or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver biopsy has a potential sampling error, it is invasive and prone to complications, so it is no longer considered as mandatory as first line screening tools for chronic liver disease. The development of non-invasive biomarkers, FibroTest-ActiTest in 2001 and more recently FibroMax, as well as transient elastography (TE) has changed the management of chronic liver disease. The aim of this review is to summarize the advantages and limits of the available non-invasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis, in comparison with liver biopsy in NAFLD patients.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)在普通人群中的患病率正在上升,因此不可能对如此大量的患者进行肝活检,以识别那些患有晚期纤维化或非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的患者。肝活检存在潜在的抽样误差,具有侵入性且容易引发并发症,因此它不再被视为慢性肝病一线筛查工具的必需手段。2001年开发的非侵入性生物标志物FibroTest - ActiTest以及最近的FibroMax,还有瞬时弹性成像(TE),改变了慢性肝病的管理方式。这篇综述的目的是总结与NAFLD患者肝活检相比,现有肝纤维化非侵入性生物标志物的优点和局限性。