Suppr超能文献

采用侧向加压法、Tagger混合法、微封闭法和牙胶根管糊剂法充填单根管的评估

Evaluation of single root canals filled using the lateral compaction, tagger's hybrid, microseal and guttaflow techniques.

作者信息

Marciano Marina Angélica, Bramante Clovis Monteiro, Duarte Marco Antonio Hungaro, Delgado Ronan Jacques Rezende, Ordinola-Zapata Ronald, Garcia Roberto Brandão

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2010;21(5):411-5. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000500006.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of voids, gutta-percha and root canal sealer using 4 different filling techniques. Fifty-two extracted maxillary lateral incisors were prepared using the crown-down pressureless technique. The teeth were randomly divided in 4 groups (n=13): Lateral compaction (LC), Tagger's hybrid (TH), MicroSeal (MS) and GuttaFlow (GF) techniques. Horizontal cross-sections were made at the 2, 10 and 15 mm levels from the apex. Digital images of the root canal areas were acquired using a stereomicroscope and examined using the Image Tool 3.0 software. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=0.05). In general, a significant decrease in the gutta-percha filled area and increase of sealer area were observed at the apical level for all the evaluated techniques (p<0.05). With regard to the presence of voids, no significant difference was found. MS and TH techniques showed a larger gutta-percha filled area than LC and GF techniques at the coronal and middle third level (p<0.05). From the results of the present study, it may be concluded that the gutta-percha filled area of fillings decrease at the apical level, regardless of the filling technique used.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用4种不同的充填技术来确定根管内空隙、牙胶和根管封闭剂的百分比。采用冠向下无压力技术对52颗拔除的上颌侧切牙进行预备。将牙齿随机分为4组(n = 13):侧向加压(LC)、Tagger混合(TH)、MicroSeal(MS)和GuttaFlow(GF)技术组。在距根尖2、10和15 mm水平制作横切面。使用体视显微镜获取根管区域的数字图像,并使用Image Tool 3.0软件进行检查。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计分析(α = 0.05)。总体而言,对于所有评估技术,在根尖水平观察到牙胶充填面积显著减少,封闭剂面积增加(p < 0.05)。关于空隙的存在,未发现显著差异。在冠部和中三分之一水平,MS和TH技术显示出比LC和GF技术更大的牙胶充填面积(p < 0.05)。从本研究结果可以得出结论,无论使用何种充填技术,充填物的牙胶充填面积在根尖水平都会减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验