NYU Langone Medical Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jan;33(1):128-35. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22395.
To compare single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS EPI) diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) of abdominal organs between 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0T in healthy volunteers in terms of image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and ADC reproducibility.
Eight healthy volunteers were prospectively imaged in this HIPAA-compliant IRB-approved study. Each subject underwent two consecutive scans at both 1.5 and 3.0T, which included breathhold and free-breathing DWI using a wide range of b-values (0 to 800 s/mm²). A blinded observer rated subjective image quality (maximum score= 8), and a separate observer placed regions of interest within the liver, renal cortices, pancreas, and spleen to measure ADC at each field strength. Paired Wilcoxon tests were used to compare abdominal DWI between 1.5T and 3.0T for specific combinations of organs, b-values, and acquisition techniques.
Subjective image quality was significantly lower at 3.0T for all comparisons (P = 0.0078- 0.0156). ADC values were similar at 1.5T and 3.0T for all assessed organs, except for lower liver ADC at 3.0T using b0-500-600 and breathhold technique. ADC reproducibility was moderate at both 1.5T and 3.0T, with no significant difference in coefficient of variation of ADC between field strengths.
Compared with 1.5T, SS EPI at 3.0T provided generally similar ADC values, however, with worse image quality. Further optimization of abdominal DWI at 3.0T is needed.
在健康志愿者中比较 1.5T 和 3.0T 单次激发回波平面成像(SS EPI)扩散加权 MRI(DWI)在腹部器官的图像质量、表观扩散系数(ADC)值和 ADC 可重复性方面的差异。
这项符合 HIPAA 规定并经 IRB 批准的前瞻性研究纳入了 8 名健康志愿者。每位志愿者均在 1.5T 和 3.0T 上连续进行两次扫描,包括使用大范围 b 值(0 至 800 s/mm²)的屏气和自由呼吸 DWI。一位盲法观察者对主观图像质量进行评分(满分 8 分),另一位观察者在肝脏、肾皮质、胰腺和脾脏内放置感兴趣区,以在每个场强下测量 ADC 值。采用配对 Wilcoxon 检验比较了 1.5T 和 3.0T 之间特定器官、b 值和采集技术组合的腹部 DWI。
对于所有比较,3.0T 的主观图像质量均显著更低(P=0.0078-0.0156)。除了使用 b0-500-600 和屏气技术时肝脏 ADC 更低外,1.5T 和 3.0T 下所有评估器官的 ADC 值相似。1.5T 和 3.0T 的 ADC 可重复性均为中等,场强间 ADC 变异系数无显著差异。
与 1.5T 相比,3.0T 的 SS EPI 提供了大致相似的 ADC 值,但图像质量更差。需要进一步优化 3.0T 下的腹部 DWI。