Suppr超能文献

通过筛查和标准实践确定的新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管风险特征和规定的心脏保护治疗存在差异。

Contrasting cardiovascular risk profiles and prescribed cardio-protective therapies in newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes identified through screening and standard practice.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Mar;91(3):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.11.021. Epub 2010 Dec 30.

Abstract

AIMS

Screening for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may improve long-term outcomes by managing cardiovascular risk at an earlier stage of the disease. The cardiovascular risk profile of screen-detected (SD) T2DM is ill defined and has not been compared to conventional newly diagnosed (CD) cases.

METHODS

Baseline data from SD (n=337) and CD (n=824) cohorts were compared. SD adopted mixed approaches to screening, population based (n=214) and cardiovascular-risk factor targeted (n=123). CD reflected UK primary care practice with cases referred within four weeks of diagnosis.

RESULTS

People with SD T2DM were leaner, had a lower HbA1c(%) and lower triglyceride but were more hypertensive compared to people with CD T2DM. Fewer SD were on blood pressure lowering (46% vs. 60%, p<0.0001), statin (30% vs. 41%, p<0.0001) or anti-platelet (15% vs. 27%, p<0.0001) therapies. Modelled 10 year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk was actually greater in the SD group compared to CD (CVD: 20.8 vs. 17.2, p=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Individuals with SD T2DM are at high risk of CVD as a result of untreated hyperglycaemia, hypertension and dyslipidaemia. Those prescribed antihypertensive or lipid-lowering therapies frequently still had inadequate control. Identifying vascular risk by screening for latent glucose disease provides therapeutic opportunities for earlier intervention.

摘要

目的

通过在疾病早期管理心血管风险,筛查 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)可能改善长期预后。尚未对筛查发现的(SD)T2DM 的心血管风险特征进行定义,也未将其与传统的新诊断(CD)病例进行比较。

方法

比较 SD(n=337)和 CD(n=824)队列的基线数据。SD 采用混合方法进行筛查,包括基于人群(n=214)和心血管风险因素靶向(n=123)。CD 反映了英国初级保健实践,病例在诊断后四周内转诊。

结果

与 CD T2DM 患者相比,SD T2DM 患者更瘦,HbA1c(%)和甘油三酯水平更低,但血压更高。接受降压治疗的 SD 患者比例(46% vs. 60%,p<0.0001)、他汀类药物(30% vs. 41%,p<0.0001)或抗血小板治疗(15% vs. 27%,p<0.0001)的人数较少。SD 组的 10 年心血管疾病(CVD)风险实际上高于 CD 组(CVD:20.8 vs. 17.2,p=0.0001)。

结论

由于未经治疗的高血糖、高血压和血脂异常,SD T2DM 患者存在发生 CVD 的高风险。尽管经常开具降压或降脂治疗药物,但这些患者的控制情况仍不理想。通过筛查潜在的葡萄糖疾病来识别血管风险为早期干预提供了治疗机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验