Suppr超能文献

牙医对于保留受损牙齿的偏好与他们的职业地位有关:是种植体还是牙周炎上颌磨牙?

Preferences of dental care providers in maintaining compromised teeth in relation to their professional status: implants instead of periodontally involved maxillary molars?

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Feb;22(2):143-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02062.x. Epub 2010 Dec 29.

Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dentists' decision making in the maxillary molar region to find out how it is influenced by general practitioners' and specialists' characteristics as well as by the external evidence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire was developed containing clinical cases and statements to assess practitioners' opinions on the treatment of periodontally involved maxillary molars and implant therapy with sinus grafting. Data were analysed with respect to the dentists' age and specialty.

RESULTS

Three hundred and forty questionnaires were evaluated (24% from universities, 76% from educational courses, overall response rate 35.1%). Forty six per cent of all participants indicated they had specialised, 52% placed dental implants, while 33% performed sinus grafting and 64% periodontal surgeries. Forty six per cent were against or were indecisive about having sinus grafting performed on themselves. The treatment proposals given for the clinical cases revealed a preference among older dentists and general practitioners for regenerative treatments even when these were not evidence based in through-and-through furcation involvements. Resective therapies were most often selected by periodontists. Prosthodontists tended to prefer more invasive treatment options with extractions and augmentations. More experienced general practitioners favoured conventional fixed dental prostheses in free-end situations or no treatment rather than the complicated augmentation procedures, which were preferred by younger dentists.

CONCLUSIONS

Implant placement seems to be widely accepted by almost all subjects, who may either place implants themselves or refer patients. More information seems to be needed on the indications for regenerative therapies for furcation involved maxillary molars, and guidelines required for decision making in complex clinical situations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估牙医在上颌磨牙区的决策,以了解一般执业医师和专家的特征以及外部证据如何影响决策。

材料和方法

开发了一份问卷,其中包含临床病例和陈述,以评估从业者对上颌牙周炎受累磨牙的治疗以及鼻窦提升种植体治疗的意见。根据牙医的年龄和专业对数据进行了分析。

结果

评估了 340 份问卷(24%来自大学,76%来自教育课程,总回复率为 35.1%)。所有参与者中有 46%表示他们已经专业化,52%放置了种植牙,而 33%进行了鼻窦提升术,64%进行了牙周手术。46%的人表示他们反对或犹豫不决是否要对自己进行鼻窦提升术。对于临床病例的治疗建议表明,年龄较大的牙医和一般执业医师更倾向于再生治疗,即使这些治疗在贯穿性分叉受累中没有基于证据。牙周病医生更常选择切除疗法。修复医生更倾向于选择更具侵入性的治疗方案,包括拔牙和增容。经验更丰富的一般执业医师更喜欢在自由端情况下使用传统的固定牙科修复体或不进行治疗,而不是更喜欢年轻牙医的复杂增容程序。

结论

种植体放置似乎被几乎所有受试者广泛接受,他们可以自己放置种植体或转介患者。对于涉及分叉的上颌磨牙再生治疗的适应证,似乎需要更多信息,并且需要指南来指导复杂临床情况下的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验