Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Circulation. 2011 Jan 18;123(2):154-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.921106. Epub 2011 Jan 3.
An anomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva may increase sudden death risk in children and young adults, and surgical intervention is often recommended. The impact of this lesion when recognized in the adult and its management are ill defined.
We reviewed 210 700 cardiac catheterizations performed over a 35-year period at a single institution and identified 301 adults with an anomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva, either anomalous right coronary artery from the left cusp or anomalous left main coronary artery from the right cusp. Patients were stratified by the pathway of the anomalous artery and the chosen treatment. Among the 301 patients with anomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (0.14% of the cohort), 79% had anomalous right coronary artery from the left cusp, and 18% had an interarterial course (IAC). Patients with IAC were younger (52±13 versus 59±13 years; P=0.001) and more likely to undergo surgical intervention (52% versus 27%; P<0.001), but mortality was not increased with IAC. Among the 54 patients with IAC, 28 underwent surgical repair with no perioperative deaths. Patients evaluated since 2000 were significantly more likely to be referred for surgery (P=0.004). Surgical patients were more likely to have abnormal stress tests (90% versus 43%; P=0.01) and had more extensive atherosclerosis but less diabetes mellitus (0% versus 23%; P=0.01). Long-term survival at 10 years appeared similar in both groups.
In this single-center cohort study of patients with an anomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva, surgical management appears to have been favored recently. Despite no perioperative mortality, a positive impact on long-term survival was not observed. The impact of surgery in older adults with anomalous coronary arteries arising from the opposite coronary sinus with IAC deserves further study.
起源于对侧主动脉窦的异常冠状动脉可能会增加儿童和青年的猝死风险,因此通常建议进行手术干预。然而,当这种病变在成年人中被识别出来时,其影响及其处理方法仍未得到明确界定。
我们回顾了在一家机构进行的 35 年期间的 210700 次心脏导管检查,发现 301 例成年人存在起源于对侧主动脉窦的异常冠状动脉,其中包括 79%的异常右冠状动脉起源于左冠状动脉瓣,以及 18%的异常左冠状动脉主干起源于右冠状动脉瓣。患者根据异常动脉的途径和选择的治疗方法进行分层。在 301 例起源于对侧主动脉窦的异常冠状动脉患者中(占队列的 0.14%),79%的患者为异常右冠状动脉起源于左冠状动脉瓣,18%的患者为动脉间型(interarterial course,IAC)。IAC 患者年龄较小(52±13 岁比 59±13 岁;P=0.001),更可能接受手术干预(52%比 27%;P<0.001),但 IAC 并不增加死亡率。在 54 例 IAC 患者中,28 例行手术修复,无围手术期死亡。自 2000 年以来接受评估的患者更有可能被推荐进行手术(P=0.004)。手术患者更可能有异常应激试验(90%比 43%;P=0.01),且有更广泛的动脉粥样硬化,但糖尿病较少(0%比 23%;P=0.01)。两组患者的 10 年长期生存率似乎相似。
在这项对起源于对侧主动脉窦的异常冠状动脉患者的单中心队列研究中,最近似乎更倾向于手术治疗。尽管没有围手术期死亡,但并未观察到对长期生存的积极影响。起源于对侧冠状动脉窦的异常冠状动脉,且动脉间型病变的老年患者的手术治疗效果值得进一步研究。