Suppr超能文献

多支血管冠状动脉血运重建中药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期比较:来自 Asan 医疗中心多支血管血运重建登记处的 5 年结果。

Long-term comparison of drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary revascularization: 5-year outcomes from the Asan Medical Center-Multivessel Revascularization Registry.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jan 11;57(2):128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We performed the long-term (5-year) follow-up of a large cohort of patients who underwent drug-eluting stent (DES) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery for multivessel revascularization.

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available on very long-term outcomes after multivessel DES treatment relative to CABG.

METHODS

We evaluated 3,042 patients with multivessel disease who received DES (n = 1,547) or underwent CABG (n = 1,495) between January 2003 and December 2005, and for whom complete follow-up data were available for a median 5.6 years (interquartile range: 4.6 to 6.3 years). We compared adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; and repeat revascularization).

RESULTS

After adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors, 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76 to 1.32, p = 0.99) and the combined risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.24, p = 0.81) were similar between the DES group and the CABG group. However, the rates of revascularization were significantly higher in the DES group (HR: 2.93; 95% CI: 2.20 to 3.90, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in comparisons of DES with CABG for high-risk clinical and anatomic subgroups with diabetes mellitus, abnormal ventricular function, age 65 years or more, and 3-vessel and left main disease. However, mortality benefit with DES implantation relative to CABG was noted in patients with 2-vessel disease (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.92, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with multivessel disease, DES treatment, compared with CABG, showed similar rates of mortality and of the composite safety outcomes, but higher rates of revascularization up to 5 years.

摘要

目的

我们对接受药物洗脱支架(DES)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)进行多血管血运重建的大量患者进行了长期(5 年)随访。

背景

与 CABG 相比,关于多血管 DES 治疗后非常长期结局的信息有限。

方法

我们评估了 2003 年 1 月至 2005 年 12 月期间接受 DES(n=1547)或 CABG(n=1495)治疗的 3042 例多血管疾病患者,中位随访时间为 5.6 年(四分位距:4.6 至 6.3 年),且所有患者均获得了完整的随访数据。我们比较了不良结局(死亡;死亡、心肌梗死或卒中和再次血运重建的复合结局)。

结果

在调整了基线风险因素差异后,DES 组和 CABG 组 5 年死亡风险(风险比[HR]:1.00;95%置信区间[CI]:0.76 至 1.32,p=0.99)和死亡、心肌梗死或卒中和再次血运重建的复合风险(HR:0.97;95% CI:0.76 至 1.24,p=0.81)相似。然而,DES 组的血运重建率显著较高(HR:2.93;95% CI:2.20 至 3.90,p<0.001)。在伴有糖尿病、心室功能异常、年龄≥65 岁、3 支血管病变和左主干病变的高危临床和解剖亚组中,DES 与 CABG 的比较也得到了类似的结果。然而,在 2 支血管疾病患者中,DES 植入相对于 CABG 的死亡率获益是明显的(HR:0.57;95% CI:0.36 至 0.92,p=0.02)。

结论

对于多血管疾病患者,DES 治疗与 CABG 相比,死亡率和安全性复合结局相似,但 5 年内血运重建率更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验