Young J W, Resnik C S
Department of Radiology, University of Maryland Medical System/Hospital, Baltimore 21201.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Dec;155(6):1169-75. doi: 10.2214/ajr.155.6.2122661.
Historically, pelvic fractures have been classified according to whether there is pelvic stability or instability, although confusion has been caused by the inclusion of many eponyms that mainly reflect the observation of a single author on a particular fracture pattern. Pennal and Tile were the first authors to attempt to classify pelvic fractures according to the force vector causing them. This concept was refined by Young and Burgess, who provided a more detailed classification system, again relating to force vectors. This article focuses on this classification and its significance with regard to pelvic stability, type of pelvic disruption, and hence the type of corrective forces that should be applied in the surgical management. Use of a classification system of pelvic fractures based on force vectors allows the orthopedic surgeon to apply external fixation in the most appropriate manner to correct pelvic deformity and to maximize patients' survival.
从历史上看,骨盆骨折一直是根据骨盆是否稳定来分类的,尽管由于纳入了许多主要反映单一作者对特定骨折模式观察的人名命名法而造成了混淆。佩纳尔和泰尔是最早尝试根据导致骨盆骨折的力向量对其进行分类的作者。扬和伯吉斯对这一概念进行了完善,他们提供了一个更详细的分类系统,同样与力向量相关。本文重点关注这一分类及其在骨盆稳定性、骨盆破坏类型方面的意义,以及因此在手术治疗中应施加的矫正力类型。基于力向量的骨盆骨折分类系统的使用,使骨科医生能够以最合适的方式应用外固定来纠正骨盆畸形,并最大限度地提高患者的生存率。