Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionelle et Evolutive, Centre Louis Emberger, CNRS, Route de Mende, BP 5051, 34033 Montpellier Cedex, France.
Trends Ecol Evol. 1991 Aug;6(8):246-9. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90070-E.
Phenotypic plasticity has often been assumed to buffer the effects of natural selection and thus act as a constraint on evolutionary change. It has become increasingly clear, however, that phenotypic plasticity actually represents a fundamental component of evolutionary change. Where genetic variation for plasticity exists, a population with a different mean plasticity can evolve. Recent attention has been focused on the conditions necessary for the evolution of phenotypic plasticity, i.e. those under which a generalist strategy, as opposed to a range of genetically differentiated specialists, will be favoured. It is also now clear that genotypes that perform best in one environment usually perform less well than other genotypes in a different environment; hence, their greater response is not an adaptation to environmental variation. A response to environmental variation is only adaptive if it represents a mechanism by which relative fitness is maintained in the face of environmental variation. Adaptive plasticity may thus involve both physiological homeostasis and morphological response.
表型可塑性通常被认为可以缓冲自然选择的影响,从而成为进化变化的限制因素。然而,越来越明显的是,表型可塑性实际上代表了进化变化的一个基本组成部分。如果存在可塑性的遗传变异,那么具有不同平均可塑性的种群就可以进化。最近人们的注意力集中在进化表型可塑性所需的条件上,即哪些条件有利于一般性策略,而不是一系列遗传分化的专家策略。现在也很清楚,在一种环境中表现最好的基因型通常在另一种环境中表现不如其他基因型好;因此,它们更大的反应不是对环境变化的适应。只有当环境变化的反应代表了一种在面对环境变化时保持相对适应性的机制时,它才是适应性的。因此,适应性可塑性可能既涉及生理内稳态,也涉及形态响应。