Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗后心包摩擦音对预测心肌损伤程度的作用。TAMI研究组

Usefulness of a pericardial friction rub after thrombolytic therapy during acute myocardial infarction in predicting amount of myocardial damage. The TAMI Study Group.

作者信息

Wall T C, Califf R M, Harrelson-Woodlief L, Mark D B, Honan M, Abbotsmith C W, Candela R, Berrios E, Phillips H R, Topol E J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1990 Dec 15;66(20):1418-21. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90526-7.

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical incidence and outcomes of patients with pericarditis after thrombolytic therapy, 810 patients were prospectively studied during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Pericarditis was defined as the presence of a pericardial friction rub during the hospital course. Only 5% of patients developed a rub during AMI, a low percent compared with that in the prethrombolytic era. A pericardial friction rub more often occurred in the setting of an anterior wall AMI. Patients with, compared to those without, a pericardial friction rub had lower ejection fractions (45 vs 51%, p = 0.002); worse regional left ventricular function (-3.2 vs 2.7, standard deviation per chord); higher in-hospital mortality (15 vs 6%, p = 0.056); a higher frequency of power failure (83 vs 57%); a higher frequency of anterior wall location of the AMI (53% of cases, p = 0.002); and a higher frequency of 3-vessel disease. Therefore, although the frequency of a pericardial friction rub was low (5%) compared with that in the prethrombolytic era, its occurrence denotes more extensive myocardial damage with a worse clinical outcome. Perhaps with successful reperfusion of the infarct-related vessel, transmural myocardial necrosis is prevented and with it the development of pericarditis. Cardiac tamponade did not occur clinically in any patient who developed a pericardial friction rub.

摘要

为评估溶栓治疗后心包炎患者的临床发病率及预后,对810例急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者进行了前瞻性研究。心包炎定义为住院期间出现心包摩擦音。AMI期间仅有5%的患者出现摩擦音,与溶栓治疗前时代相比比例较低。心包摩擦音更常出现在前壁AMI患者中。与未出现心包摩擦音的患者相比,出现心包摩擦音的患者射血分数较低(45%对51%,p = 0.002);左心室局部功能较差(-3.2对2.7,每弦标准差);院内死亡率较高(15%对6%,p = 0.056);心力衰竭发生率较高(83%对57%);AMI前壁定位发生率较高(53%的病例,p = 0.002);三支血管病变发生率较高。因此,尽管与溶栓治疗前时代相比心包摩擦音的发生率较低(5%),但其出现表明心肌损伤更广泛,临床预后更差。或许随着梗死相关血管的成功再灌注,透壁性心肌坏死得以预防,心包炎的发生也随之避免。临床上,出现心包摩擦音的患者均未发生心脏压塞。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验