George Lauder, Armand Leroi and Michael Rose are at the Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717, USA.
Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Aug;8(8):294-7. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90258-Q.
The historical definition of adaptations has come into wide use as comparative biologists have applied methods of phylogenetic analysis to a variety of evolutionary problems. Here we point out a number of difficulties in applying historical methods to the study of adaptation, especially in cases where a trait has arisen but once. In particular, the potential complexity of the genetic correlations among phenotypic traits, performance variables and fitness makes inferring past patterns of selection from comparative data difficult. A given pattern of character distribution may support many alternative hypotheses of mechanism. While phylogenetic data are limited in their ability to reveal evolutionary mechanisms, they have always been an important source of adaptive hypotheses and will continue to be so.
历史定义的适应已经被广泛应用,因为比较生物学家已经将系统发育分析方法应用于各种进化问题。在这里,我们指出将历史方法应用于适应研究,特别是在特征一旦出现的情况下,存在一些困难。特别是,表型特征、性能变量和适应性之间的遗传相关性的潜在复杂性使得从比较数据推断过去的选择模式变得困难。给定的特征分布模式可能支持许多替代的机制假说。虽然系统发育数据在揭示进化机制方面能力有限,但它们一直是适应假说的重要来源,并且将继续如此。