Suppr超能文献

根据德国神经性疼痛研究网络(DFNS)的方案进行定量感觉测试的重测信度和观察者间可靠性:一项多中心研究。

Test-retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): a multi-centre study.

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany Lehrstuhl für Neurophysiologie, CBTM, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Klinik für Neurologie, Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany Abteilung Schmerztherapie, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany Klinik für Neurologie, Technische Universität München, Germany Klinik für Anästhesie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany.

出版信息

Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

Abstract

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is an instrument to assess positive and negative sensory signs, helping to identify mechanisms underlying pathologic pain conditions. In this study, we evaluated the test-retest reliability (TR-R) and the interobserver reliability (IO-R) of QST in patients with sensory disturbances of different etiologies. In 4 centres, 60 patients (37 male and 23 female, 56.4±1.9years) with lesions or diseases of the somatosensory system were included. QST comprised 13 parameters including detection and pain thresholds for thermal and mechanical stimuli. QST was performed in the clinically most affected test area and a less or unaffected control area in a morning and an afternoon session on 2 consecutive days by examiner pairs (4 QSTs/patient). For both, TR-R and IO-R, there were high correlations (r=0.80-0.93) at the affected test area, except for wind-up ratio (TR-R: r=0.67; IO-R: r=0.56) and paradoxical heat sensations (TR-R: r=0.35; IO-R: r=0.44). Mean IO-R (r=0.83, 31% unexplained variance) was slightly lower than TR-R (r=0.86, 26% unexplained variance, P<.05); the difference in variance amounted to 5%. There were no differences between study centres. In a subgroup with an unaffected control area (n=43), reliabilities were significantly better in the test area (TR-R: r=0.86; IO-R: r=0.83) than in the control area (TR-R: r=0.79; IO-R: r=0.71, each P<.01), suggesting that disease-related systematic variance enhances reliability of QST. We conclude that standardized QST performed by trained examiners is a valuable diagnostic instrument with good test-retest and interobserver reliability within 2days. With standardized training, observer bias is much lower than random variance. Quantitative sensory testing performed by trained examiners is a valuable diagnostic instrument with good interobserver and test-retest reliability for use in patients with sensory disturbances of different etiologies to help identify mechanisms of neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain.

摘要

定量感觉测试(QST)是一种评估阳性和阴性感觉体征的仪器,有助于确定病理性疼痛状况的潜在机制。在这项研究中,我们评估了不同病因感觉障碍患者 QST 的测试-再测试可靠性(TR-R)和观察者间可靠性(IO-R)。在 4 个中心,纳入了 60 名(37 名男性和 23 名女性,56.4±1.9 岁)患有感觉系统损伤或疾病的患者。QST 包括 13 个参数,包括对热和机械刺激的检测和疼痛阈值。QST 在临床最受影响的测试区域和上午和下午的 2 个连续日的 2 个不同测试区域由测试者对(每个患者 4 个 QST)进行。对于受影响的测试区域,TR-R 和 IO-R 的相关性都很高(r=0.80-0.93),除了 wind-up 比(TR-R:r=0.67;IO-R:r=0.56)和矛盾热感觉(TR-R:r=0.35;IO-R:r=0.44)。平均 IO-R(r=0.83,26%的未解释方差)略低于 TR-R(r=0.86,26%的未解释方差,P<.05);方差差异为 5%。各研究中心之间无差异。在具有未受影响的对照组的亚组中(n=43),测试区域的可靠性明显更好(TR-R:r=0.86;IO-R:r=0.83),而对照组的可靠性较差(TR-R:r=0.79;IO-R:r=0.71,均 P<.01),这表明与疾病相关的系统性方差提高了 QST 的可靠性。我们得出结论,经过标准化培训的测试者进行的标准化 QST 是一种有价值的诊断工具,在 2 天内具有良好的测试-再测试和观察者间可靠性。通过标准化培训,观察者偏差远低于随机方差。经过标准化培训的测试者进行的定量感觉测试是一种有价值的诊断工具,在不同病因感觉障碍患者中具有良好的观察者间和测试-再测试可靠性,有助于识别神经病理性和非神经病理性疼痛的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验