Liu Dao Ning, Guo Jing Li, Luo Qi, Tian Yong, Xia Chang Li, Li You Qiong, Su Lue
Department of Plastic Surgery, People's Hospital of Jilin Province, Changchun, Jilin Province, People's Republic of China.
J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Jan;22(1):293-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f7dd74.
The purpose of the present study was to determine the locations of the supraorbital foramen (SOF) and the infraorbital foramen (IOF) relative to soft- and hard-tissue landmarks. It will provide more accurate data for dental and facial surgery. Twenty embalmed adult cadavers (40 sides; 16 men, 4 women) were dissected to expose the SOFs and IOFs, and another 46 skulls (92 sides) were also measured for further study. The locations of the SOFs and IOFs were evaluated with direct and photographic measurements. The data gained were analyzed by statistical method. The horizontal distances between the SOFs/IOFs and the medial canthus to the distance between the medial canthus and the lateral canthus ratios have been measured, and their confidence intervals are 0.22 to 0.31 and 0.34 to 0.49, respectively, and their linear regression equations are EF = 0.58 CF + 25.02 (unit: mm) and EF = 0.51 DG + 24.20 (unit: mm). The vertical distance between IOFs/SOFs and the medial/lateral canthi are 25.09 ± 3.36 mm/23.91 ± 3.31 mm and 25.75 ± 3.34 mm/26.93 ± 3.88 mm, respectively. The horizontal angle between IOFs/SOFs and the medial/lateral canthi are 72.54 ± 7.13 degrees, 66.77 ± 5.17 degrees, 47.45 ± 6.57 degrees, 54.69 ± 8.38 degrees, respectively. Based on the hard tissues, The SOF localized 20.55 ± 3.24 mm medial and 13.78 ± 2.60 mm superior to the zygomaticofrontal suture. And the horizontal angle between them is 56.04 ± 6.87 degrees. The IOF localized 18.52 ± 2.30 mm medial and 30.79 ± 3.29 inferior to the zygomaticofrontal suture. The horizontal angle between them is 31.06 ± 4.33 degrees. We also found that most (96.81%) of the IOFs were located below the middle line of the zygomatic arch. These results may provide more detailed information about the locations of SOF and IOF. And they will facilitate prediction of the locations of IOF and SOF in clinical procedure.
本研究的目的是确定眶上孔(SOF)和眶下孔(IOF)相对于软组织和硬组织标志点的位置。这将为牙科和面部手术提供更准确的数据。解剖了20具防腐处理的成年尸体(40侧;16名男性,4名女性)以暴露眶上孔和眶下孔,另外还测量了46个颅骨(92侧)用于进一步研究。通过直接测量和摄影测量对眶上孔和眶下孔的位置进行评估。所获得的数据采用统计方法进行分析。测量了眶上孔/眶下孔与内眦之间的水平距离以及内眦与外眦之间距离的比值,其置信区间分别为0.22至0.31和0.34至0.49,其线性回归方程分别为EF = 0.58 CF + 25.02(单位:mm)和EF = 0.51 DG + 24.20(单位:mm)。眶下孔/眶上孔与内/外眦之间的垂直距离分别为25.09±3.36mm/23.91±3.31mm和25.75±3.34mm/26.93±3.88mm。眶下孔/眶上孔与内/外眦之间的水平角度分别为72.54±7.13度、66.77±5.17度、47.45±6.57度、54.69±8.38度。基于硬组织,眶上孔位于颧额缝内侧20.55±3.24mm、上方13.78±2.60mm处。它们之间的水平角度为56.04±6.87度。眶下孔位于颧额缝内侧18.52±2.30mm、下方30.79±3.29mm处。它们之间的水平角度为31.06±4.33度。我们还发现,大多数(96.81%)的眶下孔位于颧弓中线下方。这些结果可能会提供有关眶上孔和眶下孔位置的更详细信息。并且它们将有助于在临床操作中预测眶下孔和眶上孔的位置。