文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

钆塞酸二钠增强 MRI 对直肠癌淋巴结分期和再分期的准确性。

Accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2011 Mar;253(3):539-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b01f1.


DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b01f1
PMID:21239980
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer. BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative assessment of nodal disease in rectal cancer impacts treatment management. Staging with modern imaging techniques (computed tomography, MRI and endorectal ultrasound) is insufficiently accurate for clinical decision making. This study aims to assess the accuracy of MRI using a novel lymph node magnetic resonance contrast, gadofosveset, for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer using a per node comparison with histology as the reference standard. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients underwent gadofosveset-enhanced MRI at 1.5T. Twenty-six patients (primary staging group I) were treated with total mesorectal excision (with or without preoperative 5 × 5 Gy) and 42 (restaging group II) underwent a long course of chemoradiation followed by a restaging MRI and resection. Nodes were scored as benign or malignant by 2 radiologists (experienced and junior reader) first on standard MRI, then on gadofosveset-enhanced MRI. For group I the primary staging MRI was compared with histology. In group II the second, restaging MRI was compared with histology. RESULTS: For the experienced reader, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC-curve (AUC) improved from 76%, 82% and 0.84 on standard MRI to 80%, 97% and 0.96 on gadofosveset-MRI (P < 0.001). For the junior reader results improved from 69%, 85%, and 0.85 on standard MRI to 70%, 95%, and 0.93 on gadofosveset-MRI (P = 0.03). Interobserver agreement was good on both standard MRI (κ 0.73) and gadofosveset-MRI (κ 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows high reproducibility and significantly improved accuracy compared to standard MRI for gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.

摘要

目的:前瞻性评估钆塞酸增强磁共振成像(MRI)在直肠癌淋巴结分期和再分期中的准确性。

背景:准确术前评估直肠癌的淋巴结疾病会影响治疗管理。使用现代成像技术(计算机断层扫描、MRI 和直肠内超声)进行分期对于临床决策来说不够准确。本研究旨在评估使用新型淋巴结磁共振对比剂——钆塞酸,对直肠癌淋巴结分期和再分期的准确性,以每个淋巴结与组织学比较作为参考标准。

方法:68 例患者在 1.5T 下进行了钆塞酸增强 MRI。26 例患者(原发分期组 I)接受了全直肠系膜切除术(是否接受术前 5×5Gy),42 例(再分期组 II)接受了长程放化疗,然后进行再分期 MRI 和切除。2 名放射科医生(经验丰富的和初级读者)首先在标准 MRI 上,然后在钆塞酸增强 MRI 上对淋巴结进行良性或恶性评分。对于组 I,将原发分期 MRI 与组织学进行比较。对于组 II,将第二次再分期 MRI 与组织学进行比较。

结果:对于经验丰富的读者,敏感性、特异性和 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)从标准 MRI 的 76%、82%和 0.84 提高到钆塞酸增强 MRI 的 80%、97%和 0.96(P<0.001)。对于初级读者,结果从标准 MRI 的 69%、85%和 0.85 提高到钆塞酸增强 MRI 的 70%、95%和 0.93(P=0.03)。在标准 MRI(κ0.73)和钆塞酸增强 MRI(κ0.71)上,观察者间的一致性都很好。

结论:与标准 MRI 相比,本研究显示了在直肠癌淋巴结分期和再分期方面,钆塞酸增强 MRI 具有高重复性和显著提高的准确性。

相似文献

[1]
Accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.

Ann Surg. 2011-3

[2]
Gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for the assessment of rectal cancer lymph nodes: predictive criteria.

Abdom Imaging. 2013-8

[3]
Noninvasive nodal staging in patients with breast cancer using gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.

Invest Radiol. 2013-3

[4]
Performance of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for staging rectal cancer nodes: can the initial promising results be reproduced?

Eur Radiol. 2014-2

[5]
Evaluating mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation using thin-section T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008-6-1

[6]
Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Part II. What are the criteria to predict involved lymph nodes?

Radiology. 2009-7

[7]
Value of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI and multiplanar reformatting for selecting good responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

Eur Radiol. 2014-8

[8]
Nodal staging with MRI after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a fast and reliable method.

Eur Radiol. 2024-5

[9]
Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009-10

[10]
Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in assessing tumour down-staging following chemoradiation in rectal cancer.

Colorectal Dis. 2009-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
ASO Author Reflections: Harnessing Multi-parametric MRI for Preoperative Lymph Node Metastasis Assessment in Rectal Cancer: DCE-MRI Makes a Difference.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-9

[2]
Preoperative Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer Using Deep Learning: Investigating the Utility of Various MRI Sequences.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-6-24

[3]
Prediction of T Stage of Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy by Multi-Parameter Magnetic Resonance Radiomics Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024

[4]
Active surveillance in long period of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: Early prediction of poor regression response.

Front Oncol. 2022-11-10

[5]
Technique to match mesorectal lymph nodes imaging findings to histopathology: node-by-node comparison.

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023-7

[6]
Establishment and validation of nomograms for predicting mesorectal lymph node staging and restaging.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022-9

[7]
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: What We Learned in the Last Two Decades and the Future Perspectives.

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023-3

[8]
Identifying Diagnostic MicroRNAs and Investigating Their Biological Implications in Rectal Cancer.

JAMA Netw Open. 2021-12-1

[9]
Lateral pelvic lymph nodes for rectal cancer: A review of diagnosis and management.

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021-10-15

[10]
Intra- and Interobserver Variability in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements in Rectal Cancer Patients.

Cancers (Basel). 2021-10-13

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索