Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil.
J Adhes Dent. 2011 Dec;13(6):551-60. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19815.
To evaluate the surface pH, contact angle and microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of a resin-cement to feldspathic ceramic after various surface conditioning methods (SC).
For pH measurements, 96 glass-ceramic disks were assigned into 12 groups (n = 8): SC1-pH: No ceramic surface conditioning (control); SC2-pH: hydrofluoric-acid (HF) 9% 1 min; SC3-pH: SC2-pH+wash/dry; SC4-pH: SC3-pH+silane; SC5-pH: HF 4% 1 min; SC6-pH: SC5-pH+wash/dry; SC7-pH: SC6 -pH +silane; SC8-pH: HF 5% 1 min; SC9-pH: SC8-pH+wash/dry; SC10-pH: SC9-pH+silane; SC11-pH: SC9-pH +neutralizer+wash/dry+sonic-cleaning; SC12-pH: SC11-pH+silane. For contact angle analysis, 40 disks were divided into 5 groups (n = 8): SC1-ca: no conditioning; SC2-ca: HF 9%+wash/dry; SC3-ca: HF 4%+wash/dry; SC4 -ca: HF 5%+wash/dry; SC5-ca: HF 5%+neutralizer+wash/dry+ultrasonic-cleaning. To evaluate the MTBS, 40 blocks were distributed into 4 groups SC (N = 10): SC1-bond: HF 9% 1 min+silane; SC2-bond: HF 4% 1 min+silane; SC3-bond: HF 5% 1 min+silane; SC4-bond: HF 5% 1 min+neutralizer+wash/dry+ultrasonic cleaning+silane. The resin cement was applied on the treated surfaces and bar specimens were produced that were submitted to 2 conditions: dry: immediate MTBS; TC: storage for 150 days and thermocycling 5000x. Fifty bar specimens were produced per group (n = 50). Contact angle and pH results were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Microtensile data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (a = 0.05).
pH values were significantly higher for SC6-ph (11.5 ± 2.6) when compared to those of SC5-pH (2.7 ± 0.4), SC8-pH (2.7 ± 0.2) and SC2-pH (2.2 ± 0.2) (p < 0.00, ANOVA). SC1-ca had the largest contact angle (48 ± 16 degrees) and SC3-ca the smallest (9.4 ± 7.7 degrees). The results of the MTBS test were as follows: independent of the storage condition, SC2-bond = SC1-bond > SC3-bond = SC4-bond. SC4-bond had the lowest MTBS value after TC (10.6 ± 2.6 MPa).
The acid neutralization step appears to be dispensable, since the washing/drying promoted similar pH values. That condition promoted a high contact angle and unstable resin microtensile bond strength to glass ceramic.
评估不同表面处理方法(SC)后长石陶瓷的树脂-水泥的表面 pH 值、接触角和微拉伸粘结强度(MTBS)。
对于 pH 值测量,将 96 个玻璃陶瓷圆盘分为 12 组(n = 8):SC1-pH:无陶瓷表面处理(对照);SC2-pH:氢氟酸(HF)9% 1 分钟;SC3-pH:SC2-pH+wash/dry;SC4-pH:SC3-pH+silane;SC5-pH:HF 4% 1 分钟;SC6-pH:SC5-pH+wash/dry;SC7-pH:SC6-pH+silane;SC8-pH:HF 5% 1 分钟;SC9-pH:SC8-pH+wash/dry;SC10-pH:SC9-pH+silane;SC11-pH:SC9-pH+neutralizer+wash/dry+sonic-cleaning;SC12-pH:SC11-pH+silane。对于接触角分析,将 40 个圆盘分为 5 组(n = 8):SC1-ca:无处理;SC2-ca:HF 9%+wash/dry;SC3-ca:HF 4%+wash/dry;SC4-ca:HF 5%+wash/dry;SC5-ca:HF 5%+neutralizer+wash/dry+ultrasonic-cleaning。为了评估 MTBS,将 40 个块分为 4 个 SC 组(N = 10):SC1-bond:HF 9% 1 分钟+silane;SC2-bond:HF 4% 1 分钟+silane;SC3-bond:HF 5% 1 分钟+silane;SC4-bond:HF 5% 1 分钟+neutralizer+wash/dry+ultrasonic cleaning+silane。将树脂水泥涂覆在处理过的表面上,并制作条形样本,将其置于 2 种条件下:干燥:立即进行 MTBS;TC:储存 150 天并热循环 5000x。每组(n = 50)生产 50 个条形样本。接触角和 pH 值结果进行单因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α = 0.05)。微拉伸数据进行双因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验(a = 0.05)。
与 SC5-pH(2.7 ± 0.4)、SC8-pH(2.7 ± 0.2)和 SC2-pH(2.2 ± 0.2)相比,SC6-ph(11.5 ± 2.6)的 pH 值显著更高(p < 0.00,ANOVA)。SC1-ca 的接触角最大(48 ± 16 度),SC3-ca 的接触角最小(9.4 ± 7.7 度)。MTBS 测试结果如下:无论储存条件如何,SC2-bond = SC1-bond > SC3-bond = SC4-bond。TC 后 SC4-bond 的 MTBS 值最低(10.6 ± 2.6 MPa)。
酸中和步骤似乎是可有可无的,因为洗涤/干燥会产生相似的 pH 值。这种条件会导致玻璃陶瓷的接触角较大且树脂微拉伸粘结强度不稳定。