Koch H T, Kambeva L, Ocama J G, Munatswa F C, Franssen F F, Uilenberg G, Dolan T T, Norval R A
Veterinary Research Laboratory, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Vet Parasitol. 1990 Nov;37(3-4):185-96. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(90)90002-s.
Theileria parva bovis isolates were tested for their immunizing capacity under natural field challenge on Willsbridge Farm in the highveld of Zimbabwe. Fifteen susceptible Sussex yearlings were immunized with the Boleni stock and 15 with a mixture of three isolates from the farm, using tick-derived sporozoite stabilates. No chemoprophylaxis was used. A dose of 0.1 ml of stabilate appeared to be safe in preliminary laboratory experiments, but the reactions were severe in the Sussex cattle and one died despite treatment. Twenty-nine immunized animals and 10 controls first experienced a mild infection, starting about 15 days after their arrival at the farm. Ten of the immunized animals and four controls had schizonts in peripheral lymph nodes for variable periods; one third of those had pyrexia. Nymphal Rhipicephalus appendiculatus ticks applied to three of the reacting immunized calves transmitted Theileria taurotragi to two animals and T. parva to a third. A second Theileria infection, due to T. parva bovis, was detected shortly after the first one. Schizonts were detected in seven out of 10 controls. Pyrexia was more severe and prolonged. Two of the controls died of theileriosis. At the same time schizonts were seen in three immune animals and eight of them had short periods of pyrexia. Intercurrent infections with Babesia bigemina, Borrelia theileri and Eperythrozoon were detected and may have contributed to the fever. Tick infestations were low during the exposure. In the second year of exposure, four out of eight new control animals had severe reactions, and one died. None of the immunized animals became ill, but one animal from the first year control group, which had not reacted previously, had clinical theileriosis. It is concluded that immunization provided an effective protection against field challenge.
在津巴布韦高地的威尔斯布里奇农场,对牛泰勒虫分离株在自然田间攻毒条件下的免疫能力进行了测试。15头易感的萨塞克斯一岁犊牛用博莱尼毒株免疫,另外15头用来自该农场的三种分离株的混合物免疫,使用蜱传子孢子稳定液。未使用化学预防措施。在初步实验室实验中,0.1毫升稳定液的剂量似乎是安全的,但在萨塞克斯牛中反应严重,一头牛尽管接受了治疗仍死亡。29头免疫动物和10头对照动物在抵达农场约15天后首先出现轻度感染。10头免疫动物和4头对照动物的外周淋巴结在不同时期出现裂殖体;其中三分之一有发热症状。应用于三头有反应的免疫犊牛的若蜱将泰勒山羊泰勒虫传播给两只动物,将牛泰勒虫传播给第三只动物。在第一次感染后不久,检测到由牛泰勒虫引起的第二次泰勒虫感染。在10头对照动物中有7头检测到裂殖体。发热更严重且持续时间更长。2头对照动物死于泰勒虫病。与此同时,在3头免疫动物中看到裂殖体,其中8头有短期发热。检测到与双芽巴贝斯虫、泰勒疏螺旋体和附红细胞体的并发感染,可能是导致发热的原因。暴露期间蜱虫感染率较低。在暴露的第二年,8头新的对照动物中有4头出现严重反应,1头死亡。没有免疫动物生病,但第一年对照组中之前没有反应的1头动物出现了临床泰勒虫病。结论是免疫提供了针对田间攻毒的有效保护。