Department of Physiology, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2503-20. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21613. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
Cognitive flexibility arises from our ability to shift behaviors depending on demand changes. Behavioral shifting recruits both a preparatory process for an upcoming behavior and an execution process for the actual behavior. Although neuroimaging studies have shown that several brain regions, including posterior parietal cortex (PPC) participated in each component process, it remains unresolved how such processes are implemented at the single-cell level or even whether these processes are distinctively carried out across microstructures in such regions. By recording single-unit activity from PPC of two monkeys performing an analog of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, we found that, in the execution process, two types of neurons exhibited activity modulation depending on whether shift was (shift trial) or was not required (nonshift trial): one type showing larger activity and the other showing smaller activity in the shift trial than in the nonshift trial. In the preparatory process, in contrast, the population activity of both types became larger in the shift trial than in the nonshift trial. The majority of both types exhibited shift-related activity modulation in both processes, whereas the remaining was specialized in the execution process. The former and the latter neurons were spatially intermingled within PPC. Significantly, when the animals performed set shifting spontaneously in prospect of a demand change, the shift-related activity modulation still emerged in both processes. We suggest that both execution and preparation signals are represented within PPC, and that these signals reflect behavioral shifting mechanisms that can be driven by either internal or external triggers.
认知灵活性源于我们根据需求变化改变行为的能力。行为转换既需要为即将到来的行为做准备,也需要执行实际行为。尽管神经影像学研究表明,包括后顶叶皮层(PPC)在内的几个脑区参与了每个组成过程,但仍不清楚这些过程是如何在单细胞水平上实现的,甚至不清楚这些过程是否在这些区域的微观结构中独特地进行。通过记录两只猴子在执行威斯康星卡片分类测试模拟任务时 PPC 中的单个神经元的活动,我们发现,在执行过程中,两种类型的神经元表现出依赖于是否需要转换(转换试验)的活动调制:一种类型在转换试验中比在非转换试验中表现出更大的活动,另一种类型在转换试验中表现出更小的活动。相比之下,在预备过程中,两种类型的群体活动在转换试验中都比非转换试验中更大。大多数两种类型的神经元在两个过程中都表现出与转换相关的活动调制,而其余的神经元则专门用于执行过程。前一类和后一类神经元在 PPC 中空间上交织在一起。重要的是,当动物在预期需求变化时自发执行集转换时,两个过程中仍然出现与转换相关的活动调制。我们认为,执行和准备信号都在 PPC 中表示,这些信号反映了行为转换机制,可以由内部或外部触发驱动。