Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Feb;105(2):83-90. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60004-8.
A dark-colored prepared abutment tooth may negatively affect the esthetic outcome of a ceramic restoration if the tooth is restored using translucent enamel-like ceramic materials.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cumulative effect that the tooth abutment color, cement color, and ceramic thickness have on the resulting optical color of a CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced crown.
A CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced monolithic crown (IPS e.max CAD LT) was fabricated. Three possible crown restoration variables were tested in vitro. The procedure examined 4 prepared abutment tooth colors (light, medium light, medium dark, and dark), 2 cement (Variolink II) colors (translucent and opaque), and 4 ceramic thickness values (1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.5 mm). The color of each combination was measured using a spectrophotometer, and the average values of the color difference (ΔE) were calculated. The data were analyzed with a 3-way ANOVA (tooth abutment color, ceramic thickness, and luting agent) and Tukey's HSD test (α=.05), which evaluated within-group effects of the tooth abutment color to the ΔE at each ceramic thickness.
The ΔE values of a CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced crown were significantly influenced by the tooth abutment color (P<.001), cement color (P<.001), and ceramic thickness (P<.001). Significant interactions were present among these 3 variables (P<.001). A dark-colored abutment tooth demonstrated the greatest ΔE values relative to other variables tested. An increase in ceramic thickness resulted in a significant decrease in ΔE values (P<.01). The ΔE values were slightly decreased when the crowns were cemented using the opaque cement.
This study demonstrated that underlying tooth abutment color, cement color, and ceramic thickness all influence the resulting optical color of CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced restorations.
如果使用半透明釉质陶瓷材料修复牙齿,深色预制基牙可能会对陶瓷修复体的美学效果产生负面影响。
本研究的目的是评估牙基颜色、粘结剂颜色和陶瓷厚度对 CAD/CAM 玻璃陶瓷锂硅增强冠的最终光学颜色的累积影响。
制作了 CAD/CAM 玻璃陶瓷锂硅增强整体冠(IPS e.max CAD LT)。在体外测试了三种可能的冠修复变量。该程序检查了 4 种预制基牙颜色(浅、中浅、中深和深)、2 种粘结剂(Variolink II)颜色(半透明和不透明)和 4 种陶瓷厚度值(1.0mm、1.5mm、2.0mm 和 2.5mm)。使用分光光度计测量每种组合的颜色,计算颜色差(ΔE)的平均值。采用 3 因素方差分析(牙基颜色、陶瓷厚度和粘结剂)和 Tukey 的 HSD 检验(α=0.05)对数据进行分析,检验每个陶瓷厚度下牙基颜色对ΔE 的组内效应。
CAD/CAM 玻璃陶瓷锂硅增强冠的ΔE 值受牙基颜色(P<.001)、粘结剂颜色(P<.001)和陶瓷厚度(P<.001)的显著影响。这 3 个变量之间存在显著的相互作用(P<.001)。与其他测试变量相比,深色基牙显示出最大的ΔE 值。陶瓷厚度增加会导致ΔE 值显著降低(P<.01)。使用不透明粘结剂粘结时,ΔE 值略有降低。
本研究表明,基牙颜色、粘结剂颜色和陶瓷厚度都会影响 CAD/CAM 玻璃陶瓷锂硅增强修复体的最终光学颜色。