Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
J Virol. 2011 Apr;85(7):3526-34. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02663-10. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
We compared the full-length capsid maturational protease (pPR, pUL80a) of human cytomegalovirus with its proteolytic domain (assemblin) for the ability to cleave two biological substrates, and we found that pPR is more efficient with both. Affinity-purified, refolded enzymes and substrates were combined under defined reaction conditions, and cleavage was monitored and quantified following staining of the resulting electrophoretically separated fragments. The enzymes were stabilized against self-cleavage by a single point mutation in each cleavage site (ICRMT-pPR and IC-assemblin). The substrates were pPR itself, inactivated by replacing its catalytic nucleophile (S132A-pPR), and the sequence-related assembly protein precursor (pAP, pUL80.5). Our results showed that (i) ICRMT-pPR is 5- to 10-fold more efficient than assemblin for all cleavages measured (i.e., the M site of pAP and the M, R, and I sites of S132A-pPR). (ii) Cleavage of substrate S132A-pPR proceeded M>R>I for both enzymes. (iii) Na(2)SO(4) reduced M- and R-site cleavage efficiency by ICRMT-pPR, in contrast to its enhancing effect for both enzymes on I site and small peptide cleavage. (iv) Disrupting oligomerization of either the pPR enzyme or substrate by mutating Leu382 in the amino-conserved domain reduced cleavage efficiency two- to fourfold. (v) Finally, ICRMT-pPR mutants that include the amino-conserved domain, but terminate with Pro481 or Tyr469, retain the enzymatic characteristics that distinguish pPR from assemblin. These findings show that the scaffolding portion of pPR increases its enzymatic activity on biologically relevant protein substrates and provide an additional link between the structure of this essential viral enzyme and its biological mechanism.
我们比较了人类巨细胞病毒全长衣壳成熟蛋白酶 (pPR,pUL80a) 与其蛋白水解结构域 (assemblin) 切割两种生物底物的能力,发现 pPR 在这两方面都更有效。亲和纯化、重折叠的酶和底物在定义的反应条件下结合,通过对电泳分离片段进行染色来监测和定量切割。通过在每个切割位点进行单点突变(ICRMT-pPR 和 IC-assemblin)使酶稳定,防止自我切割。底物是 pPR 本身,通过替换其催化亲核基团(S132A-pPR)和序列相关的组装蛋白前体(pAP,pUL80.5)使其失活。我们的结果表明:(i)与 assembin 相比,ICRMT-pPR 对所有测量的切割都有效 5-10 倍(即 pAP 的 M 位点和 S132A-pPR 的 M、R 和 I 位点)。(ii)两种酶对底物 S132A-pPR 的切割均遵循 M>R>I 顺序。(iii)与两种酶对 I 位点和小肽切割的增强作用相反,Na2SO4 降低了 ICRMT-pPR 对 M 和 R 位点的切割效率。(iv)通过突变氨基酸保守域中的 Leu382 破坏 pPR 酶或底物的寡聚化会使切割效率降低两到四倍。(v)最后,包含氨基酸保守域但以 Pro481 或 Tyr469 结尾的 ICRMT-pPR 突变体保留了区分 pPR 与 assembin 的酶学特征。这些发现表明,pPR 的支架部分增加了其对生物相关蛋白底物的酶活性,并为这种重要病毒酶的结构与其生物学机制之间提供了额外的联系。