Raach Meriem, Lebeuf Michel, Pelletier Emilien
Institut des Sciences de la Mer de Rimouski, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, Québec, Canada.
J Environ Monit. 2011 Mar;13(3):649-56. doi: 10.1039/c0em00310g. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
Due to their lipophilic properties, persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are commonly assessed using the blubber of marine mammals. However, these chemicals are also accumulating in other tissues including the liver. Some pollutants, namely perfluorinated alkyl acids, are found predominately in the liver and blood of marine mammals, and thus monitored in those tissues. This raises the question whether any tissue would represent an identical trend of POPs in the SLE beluga. The current study reports the first temporal trends of PBDEs and PCBs in the liver of 65 SLE belugas. Neither ∑₇PBDEs nor major individual PBDE-homolog group concentrations showed significant trends between 1993 and 2007. Also, ∑₃₂PCBs did not change over years, although, tetra-, penta- and hepta-PCB decreased by 7.1, 6.8 and 8.5%, respectively, in males, whereas tetra-, penta- and octa-PCBs declined by 11, 12 and 12.9%, respectively, in females. In order to compare the distribution of POPs between liver and blubber, a lipid normalised concentration ratio R (blubber/liver) for PBDEs and PCBs was calculated for each individual beluga. For all PBDE and several PCB homolog groups, mean R values were not statistically different from unity indicating that the partitioning of these POPs is governed by the tissue lipid-content. Temporal trends of R ratios of PBDEs and PCBs were also examined. There were generally no significant temporal trends except for PBDEs in males where R increased in average by 12.7 ± 2.9% yearly. The stratification of the blubber into a metabolically active (inner) and less active layers (outer blubber) may result in a slower response time of the blubber (full depth) than the liver to the recent change of contamination in the environment and explain the time trend differences between both tissues. This study suggests that the liver is more representative of recent exposure to lipophilic contaminants.
由于其亲脂性,持久性有机污染物(POPs)通常通过海洋哺乳动物的鲸脂进行评估。然而,这些化学物质也在包括肝脏在内的其他组织中积累。一些污染物,即全氟烷基酸,主要存在于海洋哺乳动物的肝脏和血液中,因此在这些组织中进行监测。这就提出了一个问题,即任何组织是否都能代表圣劳伦斯河口白鲸体内持久性有机污染物的相同趋势。本研究报告了65头圣劳伦斯河口白鲸肝脏中多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)和多氯联苯(PCBs)的首次时间趋势。在1993年至2007年期间,七溴二苯醚总量(∑₇PBDEs)和主要的单个多溴二苯醚同系物组浓度均未显示出显著趋势。此外,尽管雄性体内四氯联苯、五氯联苯和七氯联苯分别下降了7.1%、6.8%和8.5%,雌性体内四氯联苯、五氯联苯和八氯联苯分别下降了11%、12%和12.9%,但32种多氯联苯总量(∑₃₂PCBs)多年来并未发生变化。为了比较持久性有机污染物在肝脏和鲸脂之间的分布情况,计算了每头白鲸的多溴二苯醚和多氯联苯的脂质标准化浓度比R(鲸脂/肝脏)。对于所有多溴二苯醚和几个多氯联苯同系物组,平均R值与1无统计学差异,表明这些持久性有机污染物的分配受组织脂质含量的控制。还研究了多溴二苯醚和多氯联苯的R比值的时间趋势。除了雄性体内的多溴二苯醚外,一般没有显著的时间趋势,雄性体内的R值平均每年增加12.7±2.9%。鲸脂分层为代谢活跃(内层)和活性较低的层(外层鲸脂)可能导致鲸脂(全深度)对环境中近期污染变化的响应时间比肝脏慢,并解释了两种组织之间的时间趋势差异。这项研究表明,肝脏更能代表近期亲脂性污染物的暴露情况。