Suppr超能文献

同期顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶化疗联合同步调强放疗与常规放疗治疗局部晚期口咽癌的比较

Simultaneous integrated boost using intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared with conventional radiotherapy in patients treated with concurrent carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.061. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare, in a retrospective study, the toxicity and efficacy of simultaneous integrated boost using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) vs. conventional radiotherapy (CRT) in patients treated with concomitant carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2000 and December 2007, 249 patients were treated with definitive chemoradiation. One hundred patients had 70 Gy in 33 fractions using IMRT, and 149 received CRT at 70 Gy in 35 fractions. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 42 months. Three-year actuarial rates for locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 95.1% vs. 84.4% (p = 0.005), 85.3% vs. 69.3% (p = 0.001), and 92.1% vs. 75.2% (p < 0.001) for IMRT and CRT, respectively. The benefit of the radiotherapy regimen on outcomes was also observed with a Cox multivariate analysis. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was associated with less acute dermatitis and less xerostomia at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that simultaneous integrated boost using IMRT is associated with favorable locoregional control and survival rates with less xerostomia and acute dermatitis than CRT when both are given concurrently with chemotherapy.

摘要

目的

在一项回顾性研究中比较调强放疗(IMRT)与常规放疗(CRT)同时整合提高剂量在接受卡铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶同期化疗的局部晚期口咽癌患者中的毒性和疗效。

方法和材料

在 2000 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月期间,共有 249 例患者接受了根治性放化疗。100 例患者接受了 70Gy33 次分割的 IMRT,149 例患者接受了 70Gy35 次分割的 CRT。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计总生存率、无病生存率和局部区域控制率。

结果

中位随访时间为 42 个月。3 年局部区域控制、无病生存率和总生存率的估计 actuarial 率分别为 95.1%对 84.4%(p = 0.005)、85.3%对 69.3%(p = 0.001)和 92.1%对 75.2%(p < 0.001),分别为 IMRT 和 CRT。多因素 Cox 分析也显示了放疗方案对结果的益处。IMRT 与 CRT 相比,在 6、12、24 和 36 个月时,急性皮炎和口干症的发生率更低。

结论

本研究表明,与 CRT 相比,当同步放化疗时,调强放疗(IMRT)同时整合提高剂量与更好的局部区域控制和生存率相关,同时口干症和急性皮炎的发生率更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验