Esfahanian Fatemeh, Kazemi Rozana
Department of Endocrinology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Acta Med Iran. 2010 Jul-Aug;48(4):222-5.
Realizing the cause of Cushing's syndrome (CS) is one of the most challenging processes in clinical endocrinology. The long high dose dexamethasone suppression test (standard test) is costly and need an extended inpatient stay. In this study we want to show the clinical utility of the overnight 8 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) for differential diagnosis of CS in a referral center. Retrospectively from 2002-2005 we selected the patients of endocrinology ward in Imam Hospital who were admitted with the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome and had 8 mg DST (modified test) along with classic DST. In modified test a decrease in an 8 AM serum cortisol level of 50% or more is thought to indicate suppression and we compared the results of modified test with standard test. This test had been done on 42 patients: 10 male (23%) and 32 female (76%). The mean age of patients was 31.39 (15-63), 32 with proven pituitary Cushing's disease, 7 with primary adrenal tumors and 3 with ectopic ACTH syndrome. The standard test according to 50% suppression of UFC had 90.62% sensitivity, and according to 90% suppression had 43.75% sensitivity. The sensitivity of this test was 71.85% for serum cortisol suppression. The modified test (8 mg overnight DST) had 78% sensitivity. All of these tests had 100% specificity for the diagnosis of Cushing's disease. The positive predictive vale (PPV) of all of these tests was 100%. The negative predictive value (NPV) of modified test for the diagnosis of Cushing's disease was 58.82%. In standard test the NPV of serum cortisol was 52.6%, UFC 50% had 76.9% NPV and UFC 90% had 35.7% NPV. The results of serum cortisol suppression in modified test is better than standard test. Although 50% suppression of UFC in standard test had greater sensitivity than modified test, collecting of urine is difficult, time consuming and needing hospitalization, so we advice modified test that is much simpler and more convenient instead of standard test in the first step of evaluating the cause of Cushing's syndrome in referral centers.
明确库欣综合征(CS)的病因是临床内分泌学中最具挑战性的过程之一。长时间的高剂量地塞米松抑制试验(标准试验)成本高昂,且需要患者长时间住院。在本研究中,我们旨在展示过夜8毫克地塞米松抑制试验(DST)在一家转诊中心对CS进行鉴别诊断的临床实用性。我们回顾性选取了2002年至2005年在伊玛目医院内分泌科病房收治的诊断为库欣综合征且同时进行了经典DST和8毫克DST(改良试验)的患者。在改良试验中,上午8点血清皮质醇水平下降50%或更多被认为提示有抑制作用,我们将改良试验的结果与标准试验进行了比较。该试验共对42例患者进行:10例男性(23%),32例女性(76%)。患者的平均年龄为31.39岁(15 - 63岁),其中32例确诊为垂体性库欣病,7例为原发性肾上腺肿瘤,3例为异位促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)综合征。根据尿游离皮质醇(UFC)抑制50%计算,标准试验的敏感性为90.62%,根据抑制90%计算,敏感性为43.75%。血清皮质醇抑制试验的敏感性为71.85%。改良试验(过夜8毫克DST)的敏感性为78%。所有这些试验对库欣病诊断的特异性均为100%。所有这些试验的阳性预测值(PPV)均为100%。改良试验对库欣病诊断的阴性预测值(NPV)为58.82%。在标准试验中,血清皮质醇的NPV为52.6%,UFC抑制50%的NPV为76.9%,UFC抑制90%的NPV为35.7%。改良试验中血清皮质醇抑制的结果优于标准试验。虽然标准试验中UFC抑制50%的敏感性高于改良试验,但收集尿液困难、耗时且需要住院,因此我们建议在转诊中心评估库欣综合征病因的第一步,采用更简单便捷的改良试验而非标准试验。