St Bartholomew's Hospital, 7th Floor, Gloucester House, Little Britain, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2011 Feb 15;104(4):620-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.7. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
The role of further hormone therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains unclear. We performed a multi-centre randomised phase III study comparing the use of Dexamethasone, Aspirin, and immediate addition of Diethylstilbestrol (DAiS) vs Dexamethasone, Aspirin, and deferred (until disease progression) addition of Diethylstilbestrol (DAdS).
From 2001 to 2008, 270 men with chemotherapy-naive CRPC were randomly assigned, in a 1 : 1 ratio, to receive either DAiS or DAdS. They were stratified for performance status, presence of bone metastases, and previous normalisation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to androgen deprivation. The study end points were the proportion of patients achieving a 50% PSA response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and quality of life. Intention-to-treat analysis was carried out. The effect of treatment was studied first by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test, and finally through multivariable stratified Cox's proportional hazards model adjusting for the effects of possible baseline prognostic factors. Quality of life was analysed using multivariate analysis of variance.
At study entry, the median age was 76 years (inter-quartile range: 70-80 years), the median PSA was 79 ng ml(-1), and 76% of the cohort had metastatic disease. The response rates for DAiS (68%) and DAdS (64%) were not significantly different (P=0.49). Similar to the response rate, neither the PFS (median=8.1 months for both arms) nor the overall survival (19.4 vs 18.8 months) differed significantly between the DAiS and DAdS groups (P>0.20). However, the response rate for the DAiS (68%) was significantly higher than the response rate of DA (before adding Diethylstilbestrol) (50%) (P=0.002). Similarly, the median time to progression for DAiS (8.6 months) was significantly longer than that of DA (4.5 months) (P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that patients with previous haemoglobin ≥11 g dl(-1) decreased the risk of death significantly (hazard ratio: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.25-0.77). Patients treated with previous anti-androgens alone had more than 5 times more risk of death compared with patients treated with gonadorelin analogues throughout their castration-sensitive phase. Treatment sequencing did not affect the quality of life but pre-treatment performance status did. The incidence of veno-thromboembolic events was 22% (n=28) in DAiS and 11% (n=14) in the DA arm (P=0.02). Painful gynaecomastia occurred in only 1% on DA, whereas in 40% on DAiS (P=0.001).
Dexamethasone and immediate Diethylstilbestrol resulted in neither higher PSA response rate nor higher PFS compared with Dexamethasone with deferred Diethylstilbestrol. There was no suggestion of significantly improved overall survival or quality of life. Given the significantly higher toxicity of Diethylstilbestrol, deferring Diethylstilbestrol until failure of Dexamethasone is the preferred strategy when using these agents in CRPC.
在去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)中,进一步使用激素治疗的作用仍不清楚。我们进行了一项多中心随机 III 期研究,比较了地塞米松、阿司匹林和立即加用己烯雌酚(DAiS)与地塞米松、阿司匹林和延迟(直到疾病进展)加用己烯雌酚(DAdS)的使用。
2001 年至 2008 年,270 名化疗初治的 CRPC 患者被随机分配,按 1:1 的比例接受 DAiS 或 DAdS 治疗。他们按体能状态、骨转移存在情况和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)之前是否正常化进行分层,以接受去势治疗。研究终点为达到 PSA 反应 50%的患者比例、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期和生活质量。采用意向治疗分析。首先通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和对数秩检验研究治疗效果,最后通过多变量分层 Cox 比例风险模型调整可能的基线预后因素的影响进行研究。使用多元方差分析来分析生活质量。
在研究开始时,中位年龄为 76 岁(四分位距:70-80 岁),中位 PSA 为 79ng/ml,76%的患者有转移疾病。DAiS(68%)和 DAdS(64%)的反应率没有显著差异(P=0.49)。与反应率相似,无论是 PFS(两个臂的中位值均为 8.1 个月)还是总生存期(19.4 与 18.8 个月),DAiS 和 DAdS 组之间也没有显著差异(P>0.20)。然而,DAiS(68%)的反应率显著高于 DA(加用己烯雌酚前)(50%)(P=0.002)。同样,DAiS(8.6 个月)的中位进展时间明显长于 DA(4.5 个月)(P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,血红蛋白≥11g/dl 的患者死亡风险显著降低(风险比:0.44,95%CI:0.25-0.77)。与整个去势敏感阶段接受促性腺激素释放激素类似物治疗的患者相比,仅接受抗雄激素治疗的患者死亡风险增加了 5 倍以上。治疗顺序不影响生活质量,但治疗前的体能状态会影响。静脉血栓栓塞事件的发生率为 22%(n=28)在 DAiS 和 11%(n=14)在 DA 臂(P=0.02)。仅 1%的患者出现疼痛性女性乳房发育,而在 DAiS 组中,这一比例为 40%(P=0.001)。
与地塞米松和延迟加用己烯雌酚相比,地塞米松和立即加用己烯雌酚并没有导致更高的 PSA 反应率或更长的 PFS。没有迹象表明总生存期或生活质量有明显改善。鉴于己烯雌酚的毒性明显更高,当在 CRPC 中使用这些药物时,延迟使用己烯雌酚直到地塞米松失效是首选策略。