University of Utah, 84112, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Mem Cognit. 1976 Jan;4(1):103-8. doi: 10.3758/BF03213261.
In order to assess the processing (i.e., attentional) demands of different control processes, subjects were required to perform a secondary choice reaction time task in addition to primary verbal tasks. The performance of the secondary task yielded a measure termedexpended processing capacity (EPC), which was used to infer the attentional demands of the primary tasks. Two factors, mediator type (experimenter-supplied vs. subject-generated) and intentionality (incidental vs. intentional), were varied in a paired-associate situation in an effort to affect the degree of elaboration processing. Only mediator type had an effect on recall accuracy and on EPC during both initial processing and recall. Subject-generated mediators resulted in higher recall and in higher EPC during initial processing, but in lower EPC during recall, than did experimenter-supplied mediators. Implications of these findings are discussed.
为了评估不同控制过程的加工(即注意)需求,要求受试者在执行主要口头任务之外,还要执行次要的选择反应时任务。次要任务的表现产生了一个称为“扩展加工能力”(EPC)的度量,用于推断主要任务的注意力需求。在配对联想情境中,通过改变中介类型(实验者提供与被试生成)和意图(偶然与有意)这两个因素,来影响精细加工的程度。只有中介类型对回忆准确性和初始加工及回忆期间的 EPC 有影响。与实验者提供的中介相比,被试生成的中介在初始加工时会导致更高的回忆准确性和 EPC,但在回忆时会导致更低的 EPC。这些发现的含义将在讨论中进行探讨。