University of Utah, 84112, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Mem Cognit. 1975 May;3(3):277-81. doi: 10.3758/BF03212911.
With .2-sec bursts of white noise as both conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (UCS), conditioning of first-interval skin conductance responses was obtained when the intensity of the CS equaled and exceeded that of the UCS. There was no evidence that second-interval response conditioning occurred. Nonspecific response frequencies were also affected by the variations in stimulus intensity, this raising some question about typical controls employed in SCR conditioning. There was some evidence that second interval responses were suppressed by the intense CS values. It was concluded that the existence of simple conditioning with a CS/UCS intensity ratio equal to or greater than unity was contrary to the Pavlovian proposition that a CS must be biologically less salient than the UCS in order for conditioning to occur. It was noted, however, that the suppression of second-interval responses might indicate that anticipatory CRs which are not confounded with orienting reflexes are prevented from exhibiting a conditioning effect when a high CS/UCS intensity ratio is employed.
用.2 秒的白噪声爆发作为条件刺激(CS)和非条件刺激(UCS),当 CS 的强度等于和超过 UCS 的强度时,第一间隔皮肤电反应得到条件反射。没有证据表明第二间隔反应的条件反射发生。非特定反应频率也受到刺激强度变化的影响,这对 SCR 条件反射中常用的典型控制提出了一些疑问。有一些证据表明,第二间隔反应被强烈的 CS 值抑制。结论是,存在 CS/UCS 强度比等于或大于 1 的简单条件反射,这与巴甫洛夫的主张相矛盾,即 CS 必须在生物学上比 UCS 不那么突出,以便发生条件反射。然而,需要注意的是,第二间隔反应的抑制可能表明,当使用高 CS/UCS 强度比时,不会与定向反射混淆的预期 CR 被阻止表现出条件反射效应。