Schnell-Inderst Petra, Kossmann Beate, Fischereder Michael, Klauss Volker, Wasem Jürgen
Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Stiftungslehrstuhl für Medizinmanagement der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Campus Essen, Deutschland.
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul 18;2:Doc14.
The mortality from cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic renal failure is much higher than in the general population. In particular, patients with chronic renal failure with replacement therapies (dialysis patients and patients with renal transplantation) show both increased traditional risk factors and risk factors due to the dysfunction of the renal system. In combination with necessary medication for renal insufficiency oxidative stress is elevated. Progression of atherosclerosis is promoted due to increased oxidation of lipids and endothelium damage. This link between lipid oxidation and artherogenesis provides the rationale for the supposed beneficial effect of supplementation with antioxidative vitamins (vitamin A, C and E). Such an effect could not be demonstrated for patients with a history of cardiovascular disease and without kidney diseases. However, in high risk patients with chronic renal failure and renal replacement therapies this could be different.
The objective of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of supplementation with antioxidative vitamins A, C or E to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney diseases, dialysis-requiring patients and patients after a renal transplantation with or without cardiovascular diseases.
A systematic literature review was conducted with documented search and selection of the literature, using a priori defined inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as a documented extraction and assessment of the literature according to the methods of evidence-based medicine.
21 publications met the inclusion criteria for the evaluation of clinical effectiveness. No study could be identified for the economic evaluation. Two studies (four publications) analysed the effect of oral supplementation on the secondary prevention of clinical cardiovascular endpoints. Studies analysing the effect on patients without a history of cardiovascular disease could not be identified. 17 studies analysed the effect of oral supplementation or infusion with antioxidative vitamins or the supplementation with dialysis membranes coated with vitamin E on intermediate outcomes like oxidative stress or vessel parameters. The two randomized clinical trials analysing the effect of orally supplemented vitamin E on clinical endpoints in patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency and for haemodialysis patients respectively reported different results. After 4.5 years supplementation with a daily dose of 400 IU vitamin E renal insufficiency patients showed neither a beneficial nor a harmful effect on a combined event rate of myocardial infarction, stroke or death by cardiovascular causes. The second study reported a 50% risk reduction (RR=0.46, 95%-KI: 0.27-0.78, p=0.014) on the combined event rate of fatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral vascular disease or unstable angina pectoris in the study arm with vitamin E-Supplementation of 800 IU daily. In 16 of 17 studies with intermediate endpoints the supplementation with vitamins was associated with a change of one or several of the examined endpoints in the expected direction. This means that the concentrations of the markers for oxidative stress decreased in the Vitamin E-group, the progression of aortic calcification (only one study) was reduced, the intima media thickness decreased and the lipid profile improved. No studies regarding costs or cost-effectiveness were identified.
A possible explanation for the different results in the two studies with clinical endpoints may be due to the different study populations with different risk profiles, to different dosage during the intervention or to variation by chance. Due to the absence of clinically meaningful endpoints, the relevance of studies analysing the effect of antioxidative vitamins on intermediate endpoints like oxidative stress markers is basically limited to show single intermediate steps of the postulated biological effect mechanisms by which a potentially preventive effect could possibly be mediated. The mainly unsatisfactory planning and reporting quality of the 17 identified studies and a possible "publication bias" are further limitations.
The available evidence is not sufficient to support or to reject an effect of antioxidative vitamins on secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease for patients with chronic renal insufficiency or renal replacement therapy. There is a lack of randomized, placebo-controlled studies with a sufficient number of cases and clinical endpoints of cardiovascular disease, on the effect of antioxidative vitamins either orally applied or given by vitamin E-modified dialysers. No data are available about supplementation with antioxidative vitamins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Therefore the current evidence does not allow to draw conclusions concerning this subject either. As opposed to patients with a history of cardiovascular disease without kidney diseases where there is enough evidence to exclude a beneficial effect on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease for patients with chronic renal insufficiency and renal replacement therapy this question remains unanswered. Conclusions about costs and cost-effectiveness also cannot be drawn.
慢性肾衰竭患者心血管疾病的死亡率远高于普通人群。特别是接受替代治疗的慢性肾衰竭患者(透析患者和肾移植患者),不仅传统危险因素增加,还因肾脏系统功能障碍出现其他危险因素。与肾功能不全所需的必要药物联合使用时,氧化应激会升高。脂质氧化增加和内皮损伤促进了动脉粥样硬化的进展。脂质氧化与动脉粥样硬化之间的这种联系为补充抗氧化维生素(维生素A、C和E)的假定有益效果提供了理论依据。对于有心血管疾病病史且无肾脏疾病的患者,尚未证实有这样的效果。然而,对于患有慢性肾衰竭并接受肾脏替代治疗的高危患者,情况可能有所不同。
本系统文献综述的目的是评估补充抗氧化维生素A、C或E在减少慢性肾脏病患者、需要透析的患者以及肾移植患者(无论有无心血管疾病)心血管事件方面的临床有效性和成本效益。
进行了一项系统文献综述,通过预先定义的纳入和排除标准对文献进行记录搜索和筛选,并根据循证医学方法对文献进行记录提取和评估。
21篇出版物符合临床有效性评估的纳入标准。未找到可用于经济评估的研究。两项研究(四篇出版物)分析了口服补充剂对临床心血管终点二级预防的效果。未找到分析对无心血管疾病病史患者效果的研究。17项研究分析了口服补充剂或输注抗氧化维生素或用维生素E包被的透析膜补充剂对氧化应激或血管参数等中间结果的影响。两项分别分析口服补充维生素E对轻度至中度肾功能不全患者和血液透析患者临床终点影响的随机临床试验报告了不同结果。在每日补充400 IU维生素E 4.5年后,肾功能不全患者在心肌梗死、中风或心血管原因导致的死亡综合事件发生率上既未显示有益效果也未显示有害效果。第二项研究报告,在每日补充800 IU维生素E的研究组中,致命性心肌梗死、非致命性心肌梗死、中风、外周血管疾病或不稳定型心绞痛的综合事件发生率降低了50%(相对风险=0.46,95%可信区间:0.27 - 0.78,p = 0.014)。在17项有中间终点的研究中的16项中,维生素补充剂与一个或多个检查终点朝着预期方向的变化相关。这意味着维生素E组中氧化应激标志物的浓度降低,主动脉钙化的进展(仅一项研究)减缓,内膜中层厚度减小,脂质谱改善。未找到关于成本或成本效益的研究。
两项有临床终点的研究结果不同的一个可能解释可能是研究人群的风险特征不同、干预期间剂量不同或偶然变化。由于缺乏具有临床意义的终点,分析抗氧化维生素对氧化应激标志物等中间终点影响的研究的相关性基本上仅限于展示假定的生物效应机制的单个中间步骤,通过这些步骤可能介导潜在的预防效果。所确定的17项研究的规划和报告质量主要不令人满意以及可能存在的“发表偏倚”是进一步的局限性。
现有证据不足以支持或否定抗氧化维生素对慢性肾功能不全或肾脏替代治疗患者心血管疾病二级预防的作用。缺乏关于口服或通过维生素E修饰的透析器给予抗氧化维生素效果的随机、安慰剂对照且病例数足够以及有心血管疾病临床终点的研究。没有关于抗氧化维生素用于心血管疾病一级预防补充的数据。因此,目前的证据也无法就此主题得出结论。与有心血管疾病病史且无肾脏疾病的患者不同,对于他们有足够证据排除对慢性肾功能不全和肾脏替代治疗患者心血管疾病二级预防的有益效果,这个问题仍然没有答案。关于成本和成本效益也无法得出结论。