Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mod Pathol. 2011 Apr;24(4):564-70. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.223. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
Characterization of tumor genetics and epigenetics allows to stratify a tumor entity according to molecular pathways and may shed light on the interactions of different types of DNA alterations during tumorigenesis. Small intestinal adenocarcinoma is rare, and to date the interrelation of genomic instability and epigenetics has not been investigated in this tumor type. We therefore analyzed 37 primary small bowel carcinomas with known microsatellite instability and KRAS status for chromosomal instability using comparative genomic hybridization, for the presence of aberrant methylation (CpG island methylation phenotype) by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, and for BRAF mutations. Chromosomal instability was detected in 22 of 37 (59%) tumors (3 of 9 microsatellite instable, and 19 of 28 microsatellite stable carcinomas). Nine carcinomas (24%) were microsatellite and chromosomally stable. High-level DNA methylation was found in 16% of chromosomal instable tumors and in 44% of both microsatellite instable and microsatellite and chromosomally stable carcinomas. KRAS was mutated in 55, 0, and 10% of chromosomal instable, microsatellite instable, and microsatellite and chromosomally stable tumors, respectively whereas the frequencies of BRAF mutations were 6% for chromosomal instable and 22% for both microsatellite instable and microsatellite and chromosomally stable carcinomas. In conclusion, in this study we show that chromosomal instable carcinomas of the small intestine are distinguished from microsatellite instable and microsatellite and chromosomally stable tumors by a high frequency of KRAS mutations, low frequencies of CpG island methylation phenotype, and BRAF mutations. In microsatellite instable and microsatellite and chromosomally stable cancers, CpG island methylation phenotype and BRAF/KRAS mutations are similarly distributed, indicating common mechanisms of tumor initiation or progression in their molecular pathogenesis.
肿瘤遗传学和表观遗传学的特征可根据分子途径对肿瘤实体进行分层,并且可能阐明肿瘤发生过程中不同类型的 DNA 改变之间的相互作用。小肠腺癌很少见,迄今为止,尚未在这种肿瘤类型中研究基因组不稳定性和表观遗传学之间的关系。因此,我们分析了已知微卫星不稳定和 KRAS 状态的 37 例原发性小肠腺癌,使用比较基因组杂交技术检测染色体不稳定性,使用甲基化特异性聚合酶链反应检测异常甲基化(CpG 岛甲基化表型),并检测 BRAF 突变。在 37 例肿瘤中有 22 例(59%)存在染色体不稳定性(9 例微卫星不稳定和 19 例微卫星稳定的肿瘤)。9 例(24%)肿瘤微卫星和染色体均稳定。在染色体不稳定的肿瘤中发现了高水平的 DNA 甲基化,在微卫星不稳定和微卫星及染色体稳定的肿瘤中发现了 44%的肿瘤存在这种现象。KRAS 在染色体不稳定、微卫星不稳定和微卫星及染色体稳定的肿瘤中的突变率分别为 55%、0%和 10%,而 BRAF 突变的频率分别为染色体不稳定的 6%和微卫星不稳定及微卫星及染色体稳定的 22%。总之,在这项研究中,我们发现小肠染色体不稳定的腺癌与微卫星不稳定和微卫星及染色体稳定的肿瘤之间的区别在于 KRAS 突变的高频率、CpG 岛甲基化表型和 BRAF 突变的低频率。在微卫星不稳定和微卫星及染色体稳定的肿瘤中,CpG 岛甲基化表型和 BRAF/KRAS 突变的分布相似,表明在其分子发病机制中存在共同的肿瘤起始或进展机制。