Balance Control & Motor Performance, Nancy-University, UFR STAPS, Villers-lès-Nancy, France.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun;36(13):E847-54. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff5837.
Cross-sectional study.
To evaluate whether the amplitude of spine deformation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is an important factor for postural control at disease onset.
AIS is related to disorders of postural control with potential involvement of vestibular, proprioceptive, and visual input. So far no assessment of postural control has been done in an AIS population at the onset of spine deformation.
Sixty-five female patients with AIS (mean age: 11.4 ± 2.3 years) were clinically and radiologically assessed at the time of diagnosis and evaluated in posturography, including static tests-with and without sensory conflict-and dynamic tests. Two groups were formed according to the mean Cobb angle of the primary curve.
The mean Cobb angle was 14.8° ± 5.1°; 35 patients were included in group I with a Cobb angle of 5° to 14°, and 30 patients into group II with a Cobb angle of 15° to 25°. The latter group displayed higher body sways in static tests, characterized by a larger area covered by center of foot pressure in both eyes open and eyes closed conditions, and by higher lateral oscillations in only the eyes closed condition. Group II patients displayed poorer balance control, mainly in visual and somatosensory conflict conditions. Group II patients used fewer anticipatory strategies to stabilize body oscillations than Group I patients, especially in the more challenging sensory conflict and dynamic situations.
Poorer postural performance, especially in sensory conflict situations, observed in patients with a Cobb angle greater or equal to 15°, reflect less effective central information processing.
横断面研究。
评估青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)脊柱变形幅度是否为疾病起始时姿势控制的重要因素。
AIS 与姿势控制障碍有关,可能涉及前庭、本体感觉和视觉输入。迄今为止,尚未在脊柱变形的 AIS 人群中进行姿势控制的评估。
65 例女性 AIS 患者(平均年龄:11.4 ± 2.3 岁)在诊断时进行临床和影像学评估,并进行姿势描记术评估,包括静态测试(有和无感觉冲突)和动态测试。根据主要曲线的平均 Cobb 角将患者分为两组。
平均 Cobb 角为 14.8°±5.1°;35 例患者被纳入 Cobb 角为 5°至 14°的组 I,30 例患者被纳入 Cobb 角为 15°至 25°的组 II。后一组在静态测试中显示出更高的身体摆动,表现在睁眼和闭眼条件下的足底压力中心覆盖面积更大,闭眼条件下的侧向摆动更高。组 II 患者的平衡控制较差,主要在视觉和本体感觉冲突条件下。与组 I 患者相比,组 II 患者在更具挑战性的感觉冲突和动态情况下使用更少的预期策略来稳定身体摆动。
在 Cobb 角≥15°的患者中观察到的姿势表现较差,特别是在感觉冲突情况下,反映出中枢信息处理效率较低。