Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Aug;122(8):1637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were used to index somatosensory-somatosensory interhemispheric interactions and highlight potential mechanisms by which TMS alters contralateral somatosensory cortex excitability.
Fifteen healthy individuals participated in three sessions on separate days. On each day participants received either: (1) continuous theta burst (cTBS), (2) 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or (3) control TMS over left somatosensory cortex. SEPs from right somatosensory cortex were recorded before and after TMS while participants were at rest, performed sensorimotor tracking or the sustained attention to response task (SART). Left-handed tracking performance was also indexed.
N20-P27 amplitude was increased following 1 Hz rTMS while participants were at rest. This increased amplitude was not observed during right-handed tracking or the SART. N20-P27 amplitude was not influenced by cTBS or control TMS. P15-N20 and N34-P50 SEP components were not influenced by TMS. Right- and left-handed tracking performance was not transiently influenced by TMS.
The results support TMS induced somatosensory-somatosensory interactions and offer converging evidence for an intercortical, rather that intracortical, mechanism that mediates contralateral sensory processing. These interactions appear to be dependent on concurrent attention/task demands.
Somatosensory-somatosensory interactions are reflected by intercortical mechanisms that are state and task dependent.
体感诱发电位(SEPs)用于指标体感体感半球间相互作用,并突出经颅磁刺激改变对侧体感皮层兴奋性的潜在机制。
15 名健康个体在不同的日子参加了三次会议。在每一次会议中,参与者接受以下刺激之一:(1)连续 theta 爆发(cTBS),(2)1Hz 重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)或(3)左侧体感皮层的对照 TMS。在 TMS 前后,参与者在休息、进行感觉运动跟踪或持续注意反应任务(SART)时,记录右侧体感皮层的 SEP。还索引了左撇子跟踪性能。
1Hz rTMS 时,参与者休息时 N20-P27 幅度增加。在进行右手跟踪或 SART 时,未观察到这种增加的幅度。cTBS 或对照 TMS 不受 N20-P27 幅度的影响。SEP 的 P15-N20 和 N34-P50 成分不受 TMS 的影响。右手和左手跟踪性能不会因 TMS 而暂时受到影响。
结果支持 TMS 诱导的体感体感相互作用,并为介导对侧感觉处理的皮质间而不是皮质内机制提供了收敛性证据。这些相互作用似乎取决于并发的注意力/任务需求。
体感体感相互作用反映了依赖于状态和任务的皮质间机制。