The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Medication Services Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2011 Jun;41(6):441-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02452.x.
The new Australian Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic, version 14 have revised the recommendations for the use and monitoring of aminoglycosides. The guidelines have clear distinctions between empirical and directed therapy as well as revised recommendations about the monitoring of aminoglycosides. This has led many clinicians to review their current practice with regard to the use of aminoglycosides. This review summarizes why aminoglycosides are still a valid treatment option and discusses the rationale for current dosing regimens in Gram-negative infections. In particular it focuses on the various methods for monitoring aminoglycosides that are currently being used. The aminoglycoside monitoring methods can be categorized into three groups: linear regression analysis (one compartment model), population methods and Bayesian estimation procedures. Although the population methods are easy to use and require minimal resources they can recommend clinically inappropriate doses as they have constant pharmacokinetic parameters and are not valid in special population groups, that is, renal impairment. The linear regression and Bayesian methods recommend more accurate dosage regimens; however, they require additional resources, such as information technology and healthcare personnel with background training in pharmacokinetics. The Bayesian methods offer additional advantages, such as calculation of doses based on a single serum concentration and optimization of the patient's previous pharmacokinetic data, in order to determine subsequent dosage regimens. We recommend the Bayesian estimation procedures be used, wherever feasible. However, they require the expertise of healthcare practitioners with a good understanding of pharmacokinetic principles, such as clinical pharmacists/clinical pharmacologists, in order to make appropriate recommendations.
抗生素,第 14 版修订了氨基糖苷类药物的使用和监测建议。指南在经验性治疗和有针对性治疗之间有明确的区分,并对氨基糖苷类药物的监测提出了修订建议。这导致许多临床医生重新审查了他们目前使用氨基糖苷类药物的做法。这篇综述总结了为什么氨基糖苷类药物仍然是一种有效的治疗选择,并讨论了目前革兰氏阴性感染中氨基糖苷类药物剂量方案的合理性。特别是,它侧重于当前正在使用的监测氨基糖苷类药物的各种方法。氨基糖苷类药物监测方法可以分为三组:线性回归分析(单室模型)、群体方法和贝叶斯估计程序。尽管群体方法易于使用且所需资源最少,但它们可能会推荐不适当的临床剂量,因为它们具有恒定的药代动力学参数,并且在特殊人群组中(即肾功能不全)无效。线性回归和贝叶斯方法推荐更准确的剂量方案;然而,它们需要额外的资源,如信息技术和具有药代动力学背景培训的医疗保健人员。贝叶斯方法提供了额外的优势,例如基于单次血清浓度计算剂量并优化患者之前的药代动力学数据,以确定后续的剂量方案。我们建议在可行的情况下使用贝叶斯估计程序。然而,它们需要对药代动力学原则有很好理解的医疗保健从业者的专业知识,例如临床药师/临床药理学家,以便做出适当的建议。