Department of Neurology, Marmara University Hospital, Tophanelioglu Cad. 13/15, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muscle Nerve. 2011 Mar;43(3):317-23. doi: 10.1002/mus.21877.
Established electrophysiological methods have limited clinical utility in the diagnosis of small-fiber neuropathy (SFN). In this study, diabetic patients with clinically diagnosed SFN were evaluated with autonomic tests and cutaneous silent periods (CSPs). Thirty-one diabetic patients with clinically suspected SFN and normal nerve conduction studies were compared with 30 controls. In the upper extremities (UE), the CSP parameters did not differ statistically between the patient and control groups, whereas, in the lower extremities (LE), patients had prolonged CSP latencies (P = 0.018) and shortened CSP durations (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of the CSP duration was 32.6%, and the specificity was 96.7%. The expiration-to-inspiration ratios and amplitudes of the sympathetic skin responses in the lower extremities were also reduced. Our findings indicate that the diagnostic utility of CSPs was higher than that of the autonomic tests to support the clinically suspected diagnosis of SFN.
已建立的电生理学方法在诊断小纤维神经病 (SFN) 中的临床应用有限。在这项研究中,使用自主神经测试和皮肤静息期 (CSP) 评估了临床诊断为 SFN 的糖尿病患者。将 31 例临床疑似 SFN 且神经传导检查正常的糖尿病患者与 30 名对照者进行比较。在上肢 (UE),患者组和对照组的 CSP 参数无统计学差异,而在下肢 (LE),患者的 CSP 潜伏期延长 (P = 0.018),CSP 持续时间缩短 (P < 0.001)。CSP 持续时间的敏感性为 32.6%,特异性为 96.7%。下肢交感皮肤反应的呼气-吸气比值和振幅也降低。我们的研究结果表明,CSP 的诊断效用高于自主神经测试,有助于支持临床疑似 SFN 的诊断。