Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Hara-Sanshin Hospital, 1-8, Taihaku-cho Hakata-ku, Fukuoka, 812-0033, Japan.
Int J Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;15(4):e277-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.12.010. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
The routine use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia and hematological malignancies is controversial. This prophylaxis has been reported to have a positive impact in reducing infection-related mortality, but the consequent development of antibiotic resistance has become a concern. This study assessed the effect of discontinuing quinolone prophylaxis on the etiology and the resistance pattern of blood culture isolates and on the prognosis among febrile neutropenic patients receiving chemotherapy.
The results of blood cultures obtained from febrile neutropenic patients between January 2003 and June 2009 were analyzed; these results were available through a computer database set up in 2003.
Patients receiving quinolone prophylaxis between 2003 and 2005 showed a lower incidence of Gram-negative bacteria than patients not receiving prophylaxis between 2006 and 2009 (13.5%, n=9 vs. 48.1%, n=75). Interestingly, after discontinuing prophylaxis, approximately 70% of the Gram-negative bacteria isolated were quinolone-resistant, and some were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers. The frequencies of quinolone-resistant Gram-positive bacteria isolated were similar between the period of quinolone prophylaxis and the period with no prophylaxis (61.1% vs. 64.3%). In both periods, all Gram-positive isolates were sensitive to vancomycin. The infection-related mortality was comparable between patients receiving prophylaxis and those not receiving prophylaxis (1.5%, n=1 vs. 1.3%, n=2).
These findings suggest that quinolone prophylaxis for neutropenia does not induce a significant increase in the growth of quinolone- and multidrug-resistant bacteria. Rather, discontinuing quinolone prophylaxis may induce a dramatic increase in the growth of Gram-negative bacteria, including ESBL producers. Our results suggest that the necessity for quinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic patients should be determined based on local antibiotic resistance patterns.
在中性粒细胞减少和血液恶性肿瘤患者中常规使用氟喹诺酮类药物预防是有争议的。据报道,这种预防措施可降低感染相关死亡率,但随之而来的抗生素耐药性的发展已成为一个关注点。本研究评估了停止使用喹诺酮类药物预防对发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者接受化疗时血培养分离株的病因和耐药模式以及预后的影响。
分析了 2003 年 1 月至 2009 年 6 月发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的血培养结果;这些结果可通过 2003 年建立的计算机数据库获得。
2003 年至 2005 年接受喹诺酮类药物预防的患者革兰氏阴性菌的发病率低于 2006 年至 2009 年未接受预防的患者(13.5%,n=9 与 48.1%,n=75)。有趣的是,停止预防后,约 70%分离的革兰氏阴性菌对喹诺酮类药物耐药,其中一些为产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的细菌。在喹诺酮类药物预防和无预防期间,分离的革兰氏阳性菌对喹诺酮类药物耐药的频率相似(61.1%与 64.3%)。在这两个时期,所有革兰氏阳性菌分离株均对万古霉素敏感。接受预防和未接受预防的患者感染相关死亡率相似(1.5%,n=1 与 1.3%,n=2)。
这些发现表明,中性粒细胞减少症的喹诺酮类药物预防不会导致喹诺酮类药物和多种耐药菌显著增加。相反,停止喹诺酮类药物预防可能会导致包括产 ESBL 菌在内的革兰氏阴性菌的大量生长。我们的结果表明,中性粒细胞减少症患者是否需要使用喹诺酮类药物预防应根据当地抗生素耐药模式来确定。