Indiana University School of Nursing, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Nurse Educ. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):62-5. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31820b5012.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of static simulation to high-fidelity simulation when teaching advanced cardiac life support guidelines. Using a quasi-experimental design, 49 BSN students were randomly assigned to 2 groups of either static or high-fidelity simulation. There were no significant differences between the static and high-fidelity simulation groups on the written examination. The high-fidelity simulation group outperformed the static simulation group on megacode performance.
本研究旨在比较静态模拟与高保真模拟在教授高级心脏生命支持指南方面的效果。采用类实验设计,将 49 名 BSN 学生随机分配到静态模拟组或高保真模拟组。在书面考试中,两组之间没有显著差异。在巨码表现方面,高保真模拟组的表现优于静态模拟组。