Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂和糖尿病:安慰剂对照临床试验的荟萃分析。

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers and diabetes: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, II Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Sant'Andrea Hospital, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2011 May;24(5):582-90. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2011.8. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine whether the administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on top of standard cardiovascular (CV) therapies may reduce the incidence of new onset diabetes (NOD) in placebo-controlled clinical trials. The effects of these drugs on CV and non-CV mortality were also tested.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials (11 trials, n = 84,363 patients, aged 64.2 ± 5.86 years), published until 14 March 2010, in which ACE inhibitors or ARBs were compared with placebo and NOD incidence, CV, and non-CV mortality were reported.

RESULTS

Over an average follow-up of 4.0 ± 1.0 years, there were 1,284/15,142 (8.5%) cases of NOD in active-treated and 1,411/15,130 (9.3%) cases in placebo-treated patients in the ACE inhibitor trials, and 2,330/18,756 (12.4%) cases in active-treated and 2,669/18,800 (14.2%) cases in placebo-treated patients in the ARB trials. Overall, active therapy reduced NOD compared to placebo (odds ratio (OR) 95%, confidence interval (CI): 0.8 (0.8-0.9); P < 0.01). Both ACE inhibitors (OR 95%, CI: 0.8 (0.7-1.0); P = 0.07) and ARBs (OR 95%, CI: 0.8 (0.8-0.9); P < 0.01) reduced NOD as compared to placebo. Active treatment reduced CV mortality (OR 95%, CI: 0.9 (0.8-1.0); P < 0.01) and had a favorable impact on non-CV mortality (OR 95%, CI: 0.7 (0.9-1.0); P = 0.2) as compared to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated that ACE inhibitors or ARBs should be preferred in patients with clinical conditions that may increase risk of NOD, since these drugs reduced NOD incidence. In addition, these drugs have favorable effects on CV and non-CV mortality in high CV risk patients.

摘要

背景

为了确定血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂或血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)在标准心血管(CV)治疗基础上加用是否可以降低安慰剂对照临床试验中新发糖尿病(NOD)的发生率。还检测了这些药物对 CV 和非 CV 死亡率的影响。

方法

我们对所有已发表的随机临床试验(11 项试验,n = 84363 例患者,年龄 64.2 ± 5.86 岁)进行了荟萃分析,这些试验的研究时间截至 2010 年 3 月 14 日,其中 ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 与安慰剂进行了比较,并报告了 NOD 发生率、CV 和非 CV 死亡率。

结果

在平均 4.0 ± 1.0 年的随访中,ACE 抑制剂试验中,活性治疗组有 1284/15142(8.5%)例发生 NOD,安慰剂组有 1411/15130(9.3%)例发生 NOD;ARB 试验中,活性治疗组有 2330/18756(12.4%)例发生 NOD,安慰剂组有 2669/18800(14.2%)例发生 NOD。总体而言,与安慰剂相比,活性治疗降低了 NOD 的发生率(比值比(OR)95%置信区间(CI):0.8(0.8-0.9);P < 0.01)。ACE 抑制剂(OR 95%CI:0.8(0.7-1.0);P = 0.07)和 ARB(OR 95%CI:0.8(0.8-0.9);P < 0.01)与安慰剂相比,均降低了 NOD 的发生率。与安慰剂相比,活性治疗降低了 CV 死亡率(OR 95%CI:0.9(0.8-1.0);P < 0.01),并对非 CV 死亡率产生有利影响(OR 95%CI:0.7(0.9-1.0);P = 0.2)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,对于可能增加 NOD 风险的临床情况的患者,应首选 ACE 抑制剂或 ARB,因为这些药物降低了 NOD 的发生率。此外,这些药物在高 CV 风险患者中对 CV 和非 CV 死亡率具有有利影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验