Christman S D, Kitterle F L, Niebauer C L
Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, 43606, Toledo, OH,
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):277-84. doi: 10.3758/BF03209406.
Processing of band-pass filtered letters in the left versus right cerebral hemispheres (LH vs. RH) was examined. The present experiments constituted a partial replication of a study in which Peterzell, Harvey, and Hardyck (1989) found no hemispheric differences in accuracy or reaction time (RT) as a function of spatial frequency. However, methodological limitations of their study (e.g., the possibility that subjects were engaged in a detection, not identification, task) may have obscured possible hemispheric differences. We addressed these problems in the present study, obtaining significant hemisphere × spatial frequency interactions for RT andd', with RH advantages at low frequencies and LH advantages at high frequencies; however, these effects were not large in magnitude and were often restricted to particular dependent variables, stimulus sizes, and so forth. Hemispheric differences in response bias were also found.
研究了左、右大脑半球(LH对RH)对带通滤波字母的处理。本实验部分重复了Peterzell、Harvey和Hardyck(1989)的一项研究,他们发现,作为空间频率的函数,在准确性或反应时间(RT)方面不存在半球差异。然而,他们研究的方法局限性(例如,受试者参与的可能是检测任务而非识别任务)可能掩盖了潜在的半球差异。我们在本研究中解决了这些问题,获得了RT和d'的显著半球×空间频率交互作用,低频时RH有优势,高频时LH有优势;然而,这些效应的幅度不大,并且通常局限于特定的因变量、刺激大小等方面。还发现了反应偏差的半球差异。