Suppr超能文献

在大鼠中测量 CFA 诱导的痛觉过敏和吗啡诱导的镇痛作用:足底机械刺激后爪背侧和足底。

Measurement of CFA-induced hyperalgesia and morphine-induced analgesia in rats: dorsal vs plantar mechanical stimulation of the hindpaw.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2011 Mar;12(3):451-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01066.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sensitivity of stimulating the plantar and dorsal hindpaw surfaces in the detection of mechanical allodynia and morphine analgesia.

BACKGROUND

Several approaches are used to assess nociceptive reactivity to mechanical stimulation in animal models of pain. Although certain techniques seem to be favored for studying specific nociceptive conditions, the differences between techniques have not been directly compared and characterized. We chose to compare methods employing stimulation applied to the dorsum of the paw with stimulation of the plantar surface to demonstrate the utility of each approach in determining baseline nociceptive thresholds, changes in those thresholds after injury, and analgesic efficacy.

METHODS

Withdrawal thresholds from mechanical stimulation applied to the dorsal and plantar surface of the hindpaw were measured in rats treated with morphine after receiving subcutaneous injections of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) using Semmes-Weinstein (S-W) monofilaments and electro von Frey (EVF) stimulation.

RESULTS

In contrast to stimulation of the dorsal surface, plantar hindpaw stimulation seldom elicited an aversive withdrawal response. Differences in withdrawal response from baseline were only detectable within the first 5 hours post-CFA and only with EVF stimulation. No significant differences in stimulation techniques were observed after the initial 5-hour window. Effective dose 50 (ED(50)) for analgesic efficacy was consistently lower using dorsal stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Stimulation of the plantar surface of the paw is superior for detecting small changes in paw sensitivity at very low stimulus intensities, whereas stimulation of the dorsal surface is superior for delineating baseline pain thresholds and for detecting robust analgesia.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Reliable and sensitive assessment of animal pain behaviors is critical to translational pain research. This study demonstrates the importance of using proper test protocols in animal studies and its implication in preclinical screening of potential analgesics.

摘要

目的

比较足底和足背表面刺激在机械性痛觉过敏检测和吗啡镇痛中的敏感性。

背景

在疼痛动物模型中,有几种方法可用于评估对机械刺激的伤害性反应。尽管某些技术似乎更适合研究特定的伤害性条件,但这些技术之间的差异尚未直接进行比较和描述。我们选择比较应用于足底和足背的刺激方法,以证明每种方法在确定基线痛觉阈值、损伤后这些阈值的变化以及镇痛效果方面的效用。

方法

在接受皮下注射完全弗氏佐剂(CFA)后的大鼠中,使用 Semmes-Weinstein(S-W)单丝和电 von Frey(EVF)刺激,测量机械刺激应用于后足背和足底表面时的撤回阈值。

结果

与背侧表面刺激相比,足底后足刺激很少引起回避反应。仅在 CFA 后 5 小时内,并且仅使用 EVF 刺激才能检测到与基线差异的撤回反应。在最初的 5 小时窗口后,刺激技术之间没有观察到显著差异。使用背侧刺激时,镇痛功效的有效剂量 50(ED(50))始终较低。

结论

足底表面刺激在检测非常低刺激强度下的足底敏感性小变化方面更为优越,而背侧表面刺激在描绘基线疼痛阈值和检测强镇痛方面更为优越。

临床相关性

可靠和敏感的动物疼痛行为评估对转化疼痛研究至关重要。本研究表明,在动物研究中使用适当的测试方案的重要性及其对潜在镇痛剂的临床前筛选的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验