Suppr超能文献

漏斗胸无效开放手术后的微创修复。

Minimally invasive repair after inefficient open surgery for pectus excavatum.

机构信息

Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Sep;40(3):625-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.048. Epub 2011 Feb 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pectus excavatum is the most common chest wall deformity, and both open surgery and minimally invasive repair have been proposed for primary correction. The aim of this study was to show the feasibility of minimally invasive repair of recurrent pectus excavatum in patients with inefficient previous open surgery.

METHODS

A total of 135 patients underwent minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum between June 2006 and February 2010. Ten patients had a previous unsatisfactory open surgical repair of the deformity. Operation duration, length of hospital stay, complications and the need for a revision operation were compared between the primary Nuss (N) and the Nuss after Ravitch (RN) groups.

RESULTS

The N group consisted of 125 patients, requiring 133 operations, whereas 10 patients in the RN group underwent 11 minimally invasive correction operations. For the N and RN groups, medians of operation duration and length of hospital stay were 60 (20-180) and 60 (30-120) min, and 5 (2-15) and 5 (3-10) days, respectively. The differences between the two values were found to be statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Development of perioperative or postoperative complications in both groups was found not to be associated with primary or redo minimally invasive surgery (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive repair is a safe and easy operation for the correction of pectus excavatum. Previous open surgical repair is not a contraindication for the redo minimally invasive surgery, and it can be performed with acceptable morbidity and length of hospital stay.

摘要

目的

漏斗胸是最常见的胸廓畸形,对于初次矫正,既可以采用开放手术,也可以采用微创手术。本研究旨在展示对先前开放手术效果不佳的复发性漏斗胸患者进行微创手术修复的可行性。

方法

2006 年 6 月至 2010 年 2 月,共有 135 例患者接受了微创漏斗胸修复术。10 例患者曾接受过先前不满意的开放手术修复畸形。比较了初次 Nuss(N)组和 Nuss 后 Ravitch(RN)组的手术时间、住院时间、并发症和需要再次手术的情况。

结果

N 组由 125 例患者组成,共进行了 133 次手术,而 RN 组有 10 例患者进行了 11 次微创矫正手术。N 组和 RN 组的手术时间和住院时间中位数分别为 60(20-180)min 和 60(30-120)min,5(2-15)天和 5(3-10)天。两组间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。两组患者围手术期或术后并发症的发生与初次或再次微创手术均无相关性(p>0.05)。

结论

微创修复术是一种安全、简便的漏斗胸矫正术。先前的开放手术修复并不是再次微创手术的禁忌症,而且可以在可接受的发病率和住院时间内进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验