Problem Behaviours Programme, Paul Mullen Centre, 505 Hoddle St, Clifton Hill 3068, Australia.
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Mar-Apr;29(2):220-39. doi: 10.1002/bsl.980. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
Legal sanctions alone are often ineffective in preventing stalking because, in the absence of treatment, the fundamental problems driving the stalker remain unresolved. Criminal justice interventions can be problematic because of difficulties in framing anti-stalking legislation and inconsistencies in their application. Civil remedies in the form of restraining orders may be ineffective or counterproductive. Treatment of stalkers involves pharmacotherapy when mental illness is present, but the mainstays of treatment for non-psychotic stalkers are programmes of psychological intervention. These depend on accurate assessment of the risks inherent in stalking and on the identification of psychological deficits, needs, and responsivity factors specific to the individual. Treatment can then be tailored to suit the stalker, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy. Developing a framework for identifying the risk factors and shaping the delivery of treatment is crucial. Two service innovations developed specifically to work with stalkers are presented as options to overcome current management deficiencies.
仅通过法律制裁往往无法有效预防跟踪行为,因为在缺乏治疗的情况下,驱使跟踪者的根本问题仍未得到解决。刑事司法干预可能会出现问题,因为制定反跟踪立法存在困难,而且在适用方面也不一致。以限制令形式实施的民事补救措施可能无效或适得其反。对于存在精神疾病的跟踪者,可采用药物治疗,但针对非精神病性跟踪者的主要治疗方法是心理干预方案。这些方案依赖于对跟踪行为中固有的风险进行准确评估,以及确定针对个体的具体心理缺陷、需求和反应因素。然后,可以根据跟踪者的具体情况量身定制治疗方案,从而提高治疗效果。制定一个用于确定风险因素和制定治疗方案的框架至关重要。本文提出了两种专门用于与跟踪者合作的服务创新方案,作为克服当前管理缺陷的选择。